Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36226815›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Vocalization categorization behavior explained by a feature-based auditory categorization model.

Manaswini Kar, Marianny Pernia, Kayla Williams, Satyabrata Parida, Nathan Alan Schneider, Madelyn McAndrew, Isha Kumbam, Srivatsun Sadagopan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Manaswini KarCenter for Neuroscience at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.
Marianny Pernia *Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9889-3577
Kayla Williams *Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.
Satyabrata ParidaDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2896-2522
Nathan Alan SchneiderCenter for Neuroscience at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9145-5427
Madelyn McAndrew *Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, United States.
Isha Kumbam *Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.
Srivatsun SadagopanCenter for Neuroscience at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1116-8728

Funding

Neural mechanisms underlying vocalization perception in realistic listening conditionsR01DC017141 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SADAGOPAN, SRIVATSUN · 2018 to 2022
$2.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vocal animals produce multiple categories of calls with high between- and within-subject variability, over which listeners must generalize to accomplish call categorization. The behavioral strategies and neural mechanisms that support this ability to generalize are largely unexplored. We previously proposed a theoretical model that accomplished call categorization by detecting features of intermediate complexity that best contrasted each call category from all other categories. We further demonstrated that some neural responses in the primary auditory cortex were consistent with such a model. Here, we asked whether a feature-based model could predict call categorization behavior. We trained both the model and guinea pigs (GPs) on call categorization tasks using natural calls. We then tested categorization by the model and GPs using temporally and spectrally altered calls. Both the model and GPs were surprisingly resilient to temporal manipulations, but sensitive to moderate frequency shifts. Critically, the model predicted about 50% of the variance in GP behavior. By adopting different model training strategies and examining features that contributed to solving specific tasks, we could gain insight into possible strategies used by animals to categorize calls. Our results validate a model that uses the detection of intermediate-complexity contrastive features to accomplish call categorization.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PerceptionBehavior, AnimalGuinea PigsVocalization, Animalauditory cortexbehaviorcategorizationguinea pigneurosciencevocalization

Identifiers

PMID36226815
PMCPMC9633061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.