Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36226768›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2023

Larger interface area at the human myotendinous junction in type 1 compared with type 2 muscle fibers.

Jens Rithamer Jakobsen, Abigail Louise Mackey, Manuel Koch, Thomas Imhof, Jens Hannibal, Michael Kjaer, Michael Rindom Krogsgaard

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jens Rithamer JakobsenSection for Sports Traumatology M51, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9346-1046
Abigail Louise MackeyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery M, Institute of Sports Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Manuel KochInstitute for Dental Research and Oral Musculoskeletal Biology, and Center for Biochemistry, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Thomas ImhofInstitute for Dental Research and Oral Musculoskeletal Biology, and Center for Biochemistry, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jens HannibalDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael KjaerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery M, Institute of Sports Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Michael Rindom KrogsgaardSection for Sports Traumatology M51, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Frederiksberg Hospital · DKUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Aase og Ejnar Danielsens FondBispebjerg and Frederiksberg University HospitalDanish BiotechnologyDanish medical research councilGerman reseach foundation (DFG) Grant 2722Internatioinal olympic committeeLundbeckfondenNordea-fonden
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The myotendinous junction (MTJ) is structurally specialized to transmit force. The highly folded muscle membrane at the MTJ increases the contact area between muscle and tendon and potentially the load tolerance of the MTJ. Muscles with a high content of type II fibers are more often subject to strain injury compared with muscles with type I fibers. It is hypothesized that this is explained by a smaller interface area of MTJ in type II compared with type I muscle fibers. The aim was to investigate by confocal microscopy whether there is difference in the surface area at the MTJ between type I and II muscle fibers. Individual muscle fibers with an intact MTJ were isolated by microscopic dissection in samples from human semitendinosus, and they were labeled with antibodies against collagen XXII (indicating MTJ) and type I myosin (MHCI). Using a spinning disc confocal microscope, the MTJ from each fiber was scanned and subsequently reconstructed to a 3D-model. The interface area between muscle and tendon was calculated in type I and II fibers from these reconstructions. The MTJ was analyzed in 314 muscle fibers. Type I muscle fibers had a 22% larger MTJ interface area compared with type II fibers (p < 0.05), also when the area was normalized to fiber diameter. By the new method, it was possible to analyze the structure of the MTJ from a large number of human muscle fibers. The finding that the interface area between muscle and tendon is higher in type I compared with type II fibers suggests that type II fibers are less resistant to strain and therefore more susceptible to injury.

Indexed as

Myotendinous JunctionTendonsCollagenHumansMuscle Fibers, Fast-TwitchMuscle Fibers, SkeletalCollagenconfocal microscopyinjury preventionmuscle injurymuscle physiologymyotendinous junction

Identifiers

PMID36226768
PMCPMC10091713
OpenAlexW4304893262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.