ArticleEuropean journal of translational myology2022
Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the cervical biopsy under colposcopic vision.
Article in European journal of translational myology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detecting and localizing cervical lesions in colposcopic images with deep semantic feature mining.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Radiomics-based machine learning models for differentiating pathological subtypes in cervical cancer: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- A segmentation model to detect cevical lesions based on machine learning of colposcopic images.Heliyon · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the cervical biopsy under colposcopic vision. This retrospective study was performed on 190 women, who were selected from a total of 412 cases referring for colposcopy in one year. All patients underwent colposcopy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). After the investigation of demographic characteristics and data confirmation, colposcopic characteristics were examined. Then, the diagnostic indicators and diagnostic accuracy of the cervical biopsy under colposcopic vision were determined. The mean age of patients was 35.51± 5.91 years. In smokers, the percentage of cancer and CIN3 cases was higher than in normal individuals, and this difference was statistically significant in terms of the frequency of cancerous lesions (P = 0.2). A comparison of colposcopic biopsy with LEEP has shown that the frequency of advanced cases in LEEP has been detected more, and the correlation coefficient (kappa) indicated the weak agreement between the findings of colposcopically directed biopsy (CDB) and LEEP methods. (k = 0.23). The diagnostic accuracy of the cervical biopsy under colposcopic vision for cervical cancer is effectively high. It is recommended that this procedure be performed to diagnose cancerous lesions; however, contrary to what is seen in colposcopy, malignant cases may be spreading and follow-up of patients can affect therapeutic performance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.