Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36226382›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Perspectives surrounding fertility preservation and posthumous reproduction for adolescent and young adults with terminal cancer: Survey of allied health professionals.

Francesca Barrett, Megan E Sutter, Lisa Campo-Engelstein, Amani Sampson, Arthur Caplan, Morgan Lawrence, Susan T Vadaparampil, Gwendolyn P Quinn

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca BarrettDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6880-8925
Megan E SutterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9816-9549
Lisa Campo-EngelsteinUniversity of Texas Medical Branch, Institute for Bioethics & Health Humanities, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Amani SampsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Arthur CaplanDivision of Medical Ethics, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Morgan LawrenceBarnard College, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Susan T VadaparampilDivision of Population Science, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Gwendolyn P QuinnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4208-9889
New York University · USColumbia University · USMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

LOvE (LGBT Oncofertility Education) ECHOR25CA142519 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Gwendolyn P Quinn, SUSAN T VADAPARAMPIL · 2011 to 2026
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA142519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile all reproductive-aged individuals with cancer should be offered fertility preservation (FP) counseling, there is little guidance over offers to adolescent and young adults (AYA) with terminal diagnoses, especially when considering posthumous assisted reproduction (PAR). The Enriching Communication skills for Health professionals in Oncofertility (ECHO/ENRICH) trains Allied Health Professionals (AHPs) to improve communication with AYAs with cancer. Little is known about AHPs' role in assisting in FP and PAR decisions.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional survey of ECHO/ENRICH trainees' attitudes and experience with FP and PAR in AYA with terminal cancer.

resultsThe response rate was 61% (365/601). While 69% felt comfortable discussing FP with terminal AYA after ECHO/ENRICH training, 85% desired further education. The majority (88%) agreed FP should be an option for AYA with cancer, though some agreed offering FP provided false hope (16%) or was a waste of resources (7%). Most shared that avoidance of FP discussions was common practice, especially in the medically fragile, late-stage disease, or among minors. Many attributed lack of conversations to oncology team goals. Only 9% had prior experience with PAR. Many were conflicted about how PAR reproductive material should be gifted and who should be permitted to use PAR. Several raised moral concerns for PAR, or discomfort advising family. Many voiced desire for additional PAR-specific education.

conclusionECHO/ENRICH trainees had varied levels of exposure to FP in terminal AYA and limited experiences with PAR. Many expressed uncertainties with PAR, which may be alleviated with further training and transparent institutional policies.

Indexed as

Fertility PreservationNeoplasmsPosthumous ConceptionAdolescentAdultAllied Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesHumansYoung Adultadolescent and young adultsallied health professionalsfertility preservationoncofertilityposthumous-assisted reproduction

Identifiers

PMID36226382
PMCPMC10028037
OpenAlexW4306155467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read87
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.