ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Prediction of Changes in Tumor Regression during Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma by Using the Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics.
Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Precision Medicine for Nasopharyngeal Cancer-A Review of Current Prognostic Strategies.Cancers · 2024Review
- Retracted: Prediction of Changes in Tumor Regression during Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma by Using the Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-26Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/24ECA1829B15745F337975C7D2B477
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work aimed to explore the application value of computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics in predicting changes in tumor regression during radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. In this work, 144 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2021 were selected. The patients were divided into a radiosensitive group (79 cases) and an insensitive group (65 cases) according to the tumor volume shrinkage during radiotherapy. The 3D Slicer 4.10.2 software was used to delineate the tumor region of interest (ROI), and a total of 1223 radiomics features were extracted using the radiomics module under the software. After between-group and within-group consistency tests, one-way ANOVA, and LASSO dimensionality reduction, three omics features were finally selected for the establishment of predictive models. At the same time, the age, gender, tumor T stage and N stage, hemoglobin, and albumin of the patients were collected to establish a clinical prediction model. The results showed that compared with logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, and AdaBoost models, the SVM model based on CT radiomics features had the best performance in predicting tumor regression changes during tumor radiotherapy (training group area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC): 0.840 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.764-0.916); validation group: AUC: 0.810 (95% CI: 0.676-0.944)). Compared with the supported vector machine (SVM) prediction model based on clinical features, the SVM model based on radiomics features had better performance in predicting the change of retraction during tumor radiotherapy (training group: omics feature SVM model AUC: 0.84, clinical feature SVM model: 0.78; validation group: omics feature SVM model AUC: 0.8, clinical feature SVM model: 0.58,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.