Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36226243›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

Establishment and Validation of a Machine Learning Prediction Model Based on Big Data for Predicting the Risk of Bone Metastasis in Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients.

Chan Xu, Wencai Liu, Chengliang Yin, Wanying Li, Jingjing Liu, Wanli Sheng, Haotong Tang, Wenle Li, Qingqing Zhang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Navigating advanced renal cell carcinoma in the era of artificial intelligence.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Chan XuDepartment of Dermatology, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang 712000, China.
Wencai LiuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5350-3125
Chengliang YinFaculty of Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau 999078, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8262-5749
Wanying LiDepartment of Clinical Medical Research Center, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang 712000, China.
Jingjing LiuDepartment of Shanghai National Engineering Research Center of Biochip, Shanghai 201203, China.
Wanli ShengHohhot Technical Center of Hohhot Customs District, Hohhot 010020, China.
Haotong TangFaculty of Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau 999078, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2093-9720
Wenle LiMolecular Imaging and Translational Medicine Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2933-646X
Qingqing ZhangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an 710004, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6296-7522
Xiamen University · CNMacau University of Science and Technology · MOHohhot Minzu College · CNNanchang University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNXian Yang Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Since the prognosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with bone metastasis (BM) is poor, this study is aimed at using big data to build a machine learning (ML) model to predict the risk of BM in RCC patients. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 40,355 RCC patients in the SEER database from 2010 to 2017. LASSO regression and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors of RCC-BM. Six ML algorithm models, including LR, GBM, XGB, RF, DT, and NBC, were used to establish risk models for predicting RCC-BM. The prediction performance of ML models was weighed by 10-fold cross-validation. Results: The study investigated 40,355 patients diagnosed with RCC in the SEER database, where 1,811 (4.5%) were BM patients. Independent risk factors for BM were tumor grade, T stage, N stage, liver metastasis, lung metastasis, and brain metastasis. Among the RCC-BM risk prediction models established by six ML algorithms, the XGB model showed the best prediction performance (AUC = 0.891). Therefore, a network calculator based on the XGB model was established to individually assess the risk of BM in patients with RCC. Conclusion: The XGB risk prediction model based on the ML algorithm performed a good prediction effect on BM in RCC patients.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsNeoplasm MetastasisBig DataHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID36226243
PMCPMC9550489
OpenAlexW4300961498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.