Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36226238›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

Comparison of Clinical Pregnancy Outcomes after Fresh and Frozen Embryo Transfer.

Hui Yu, Yuehong Zhang, Mei Han

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hui YuDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tongzhou District Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Beijing City 101199, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1437-3644
Yuehong ZhangDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tongzhou District Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Beijing City 101199, China.
Mei HanDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tongzhou District Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Beijing City 101199, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze the clinical outcomes of the patients who underwent fresh or frozen embryo transfer, as well as the neonatal outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of women who underwent Conclusions: Comparing fresh and frozen embryo transfers did not reveal any significant superiority. Venerable age exerts an apparent influence on pregnancy complications. Frozen embryo transfer is not always the best choice.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionPregnancy OutcomeAdultCryopreservationEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36226238
PMCPMC9550480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.