ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Establishment and validation of a clinicopathological prognosis model of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NECs) are a rare, highly malignant subset of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs). However, how to predict the prognosis of GEP-NECs by clinical features is still under study. This study aims to establish and validate a nomogram model of overall survival (OS) in patients with GEP-NECs for predicting their prognosis. Methods: We selected patients diagnosed with GEP-NECs from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and two Chinese hospitals. After randomization, we divided the data in the SEER database into the train cohort and the test cohort at a ratio of 7:3 and used the Chinese cohort as the validation cohort. The Cox univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to incorporate statistically significant variables into the nomogram model. We then established a nomogram and validated it by concordance index (C-index), calibration curve, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under the curve (AUC), and the decision curve analysis (DCA) curve. Results: We calculated the nomogram C-index as 0.797 with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 0.783-0.815 in the train cohort, 0.816 (95% CI: 0.794-0.833) in the test cohort and 0.801 (95% CI: 0.784-0.827) in the validation cohort. Then, we plotted the calibration curves and ROC curves, and AUCs were obtained to verify the specificity and sensitivity of the model, with 1-, 3- and 5-year AUCs of 0.776, 0.768, and 0.770, respectively, in the train cohort; 0.794, 0.808, and 0.799 in the test cohort; 0.922, 0.925, and 0.947 in the validation cohort. The calibration curve and DCA curves also indicated that this nomogram model had good clinical benefits. Conclusions: We established the OS nomogram model of GEP-NEC patients, including variables of age, race, sex, tumor site, tumor grade, and TNM stage. This model has good fitting, high sensitivity and specificity, and good clinical benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.