ArticleIndian dermatology online journal
Dermoscopy of Oral Mucosal Lesions: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center in North India and Review of Literature.
Article in Indian dermatology online journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dermoscopic Features of Median Rhomboid Glossitis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Mucoscopic Features of Oral Lichen Planus: A Retrospective Comparative Study with Inflammatory Mimickers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Superficial mucoceles as a sequel to Stevens‑Johnson syndrome during treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with cemiplimab: A case report and review of literature.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025Article
- Oral Lichen Planus: An Updated Review of Etiopathogenesis, Clinical Presentation, and Management.Indian dermatology online journalReview
- Rapid Diagnosis of Pigmented Fungiform Papillae of the Tongue by Dermoscopy.Indian dermatology online journalArticle
- A Single Centre Cross-Sectional Observational Study on Dermatoscopy of Oral Mucosal Disorders and Histopathological Correlation in Tertiary Care Centre from Central India.Indian journal of dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with mucosal lesions form a significant number of routine outpatients presenting to the dermatology department where diagnostic confirmation using histopathological examination of mucosal biopsy is neither feasible nor warranted in every patient. Objective: To study the dermoscopic features of various mucosal lesions affecting the oral cavity and to assess the reliability of mucoscopy vis-a-vis clinico-laboratory findings. Materials and Methods: An observational, cross-sectional, hospital-based study was conducted over a period of 2 years from March 2019 to February 2021 in the dermatology outpatient department. Patients presenting with oral mucosal lesions, with or without associated cutaneous involvement, were recruited for mucoscopic evaluation after taking an informed written consent. A detailed history and clinical examination, with emphasis on mucocutaneous examination, was performed and findings were recorded on a standard predesigned proforma. Mucoscopy of oral mucosa was carried out using a handheld dermoscope as well as Universal Serial Bus connected video-dermoscope in both nonpolarized and polarized modes. The different mucoscopic features were seen at these sites, compared with each other, analyzed and findings were recorded. A diagnosis was made on the basis of mucoscopic findings and correlated with clinical diagnosis. The data was analyzed using appropriate statistical tests. Results: The mean age of patients was 34.3 years and the mean lesional duration was 68.2 weeks. Oral lichen planus (18.66%) was the most common disorder studied, followed by recurrent apthous stomatitis (16.00%), pigmentary lesions (12.66%), vascular disorders (12.00%), mucocele (5.33%), pemphigus vulgaris (4.66%), and discoid lupus erythematosus (4.66%). Conclusion: Dermoscopy in oral lesions facilitates the visualization of the mucosal surface and provides quick confirmation of diagnosis in various mucosal disorders with advanced diagnostic accuracy. Mucoscopy was found helpful in differentiating the oral ulcers, which are a presenting feature of various serious mucocutaneous disorders. Mucoscopy could be a helpful aid in diagnosing pigmented skin lesions and alleviating the apprehension regarding oral melanoma and serve as a screening tool in case of squamous cell carcinoma lips. Limitations: Confirmatory histopathological analysis and correlation with mucoscopic findings could not be established in our study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.