Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36225991›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2022

Factors That Guide the Diagnosis and Treatment Planning for Impacted Canines Using Three-Dimensional Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Hasan Sabah Hasan, Mohamed A Elkolaly, Ramy Elmoazen, Ayshan Kolemen, Arkan Muslim Al Azzawi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hasan Sabah HasanOrthodontic Department, Azadi Dental Teaching Center, General Directorate of Hawler, Ministry of Health, Erbil, Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5276-2769
Mohamed A ElkolalyOrthodontic Department, Royal Dental Center, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2745-7791
Ramy ElmoazenSchool of Computing, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu 80100, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5792-1340
Ayshan KolemenOrthodontic Department, Al-Mustaqbal University College Dentistry, Babil, Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5275-9551
Arkan Muslim Al AzzawiOrthodontics Department, College of Dentistry-university of Babylon, Babil, Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9761-1259
Hawler Medical University · IQUniversity of Babylon · IQUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Impacted canines are one of the significant challenges in orthodontics that should be appropriately assessed to provide the best treatment to the patients. Materials and Methods: In the present study, 57800 patients were examined over six years to investigate the prevalence, diagnostic procedures, and treatment methodologies for impacted canine cases. Prevalence and diagnosis were tested using history taking, clinical examination, and three-dimensional cone-beam radiographs. The cases were tested for impaction site, gender, age, signs, and symptoms. The groups were classified for impaction location according to Mupparapu's classification. Result: The causative factors and the treatment methodology selected were plotted according to age and gender distribution. The total prevalence was 3.9% of canine impaction cases in relation to the total sample cases. The results showed a strong correlation between the site of impaction toward the upper arch and with distribution following Mupparapu's classification. The pain was the most detectable complication in all age groups, while root resorption was the least. Conclusion: Most of the younger age groups were sent for exposure and orthodontic traction, while the mid-aged groups elected for observation, and follow-up as their primary concern was esthetics. However, the adult patients were into exposure and traction to improve their function.

Identifiers

PMID36225991
PMCPMC9550469
OpenAlexW4300817348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.