Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36225963›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Fully automatic cardiac four chamber and great vessel segmentation on CT pulmonary angiography using deep learning.

Michael J Sharkey, Jonathan C Taylor, Samer Alabed, Krit Dwivedi, Kavitasagary Karunasaagarar, Christopher S Johns, Smitha Rajaram, Pankaj Garg, Dheyaa Alkhanfar, Peter Metherall and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael J SharkeyDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Jonathan C Taylor3D Imaging Lab, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHSFT, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Samer AlabedDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Krit DwivediDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Kavitasagary KarunasaagararDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Christopher S JohnsRadiology Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHSFT, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Smitha RajaramRadiology Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHSFT, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Pankaj GargNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Dheyaa AlkhanfarDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Peter Metherall3D Imaging Lab, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHSFT, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Declan P O'ReganMRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Rob J van der GeestDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Robin CondliffeDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
David G KielyDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Michail MamalakisDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Andrew J SwiftDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
University of Sheffield · GBSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBInsigneo · GBLeiden University Medical Center · NLMRC London Institute of Medical Sciences · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation NH/17/1/32725Medical Research Council MC_UP_1605/13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is an essential test in the work-up of suspected pulmonary vascular disease including pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary embolism. Cardiac and great vessel assessments on CTPA are based on visual assessment and manual measurements which are known to have poor reproducibility. The primary aim of this study was to develop an automated whole heart segmentation (four chamber and great vessels) model for CTPA. Methods: A nine structure semantic segmentation model of the heart and great vessels was developed using 200 patients (80/20/100 training/validation/internal testing) with testing in 20 external patients. Ground truth segmentations were performed by consultant cardiothoracic radiologists. Failure analysis was conducted in 1,333 patients with mixed pulmonary vascular disease. Segmentation was achieved using deep learning Results: Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) for segmented structures were in the range 0.58-0.93 for both the internal and external test cohorts. The left and right ventricle myocardium segmentations had lower DSC of 0.83 and 0.58 respectively while all other structures had DSC >0.89 in the internal test cohort and >0.87 in the external test cohort. Interobserver comparison found that the left and right ventricle myocardium segmentations showed the most variation between observers: mean DSC (range) of 0.795 (0.785-0.801) and 0.520 (0.482-0.542) respectively. Right ventricle myocardial volume had strong correlation with mean pulmonary artery pressure (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.7). The volume of segmented cardiac structures by deep learning had higher or equivalent correlation with invasive haemodynamics than by manual segmentations. The model demonstrated good generalisability to different vendors and hospitals with similar performance in the external test cohort. The failure rates in mixed pulmonary vascular disease were low (<3.9%) indicating good generalisability of the model to different diseases. Conclusion: Fully automated segmentation of the four cardiac chambers and great vessels has been achieved in CTPA with high accuracy and low rates of failure. DL volumetric biomarkers can potentially improve CTPA cardiac assessment and invasive haemodynamic prediction.

Indexed as

computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA)deep-learning (DL)pulmonary vascular disease (PVD)semantic segmentation and labellingwhole heart segmentation

Identifiers

PMID36225963
PMCPMC9549370
OpenAlexW4297225282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.