Virtual Planning and Mixed Reality for the Thin Anterolateral Thigh Perforator Flap.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Randomized crossover study of immersive planning in craniomaxillofacial trauma comparing virtual reality and workstation workflows.Scientific reports · 2026
   Trial
2. Four Decades of the Anterolateral Thigh Flap: Celebrating a Milestone in Reconstructive Microsurgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
   Article
3. Exploring the Use of Robotics in Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery: A Comprehensive Perspective.Cureus · 2025
   Review
4. Application of digital model of mixed reality dynamic tracking technique in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a basic research.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.