Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36225763›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Perception towards vaccine effectiveness in controlling COVID-19 spread in rural and urban communities: A global survey.

Roy R Marzo, Rajeev Shrestha, Binaya Sapkota, Swosti Acharya, Nita Shrestha, Mandip Pokharel, Absar Ahmad, Mark E Patalinghug, Farzana Rahman, Zahir R Salim and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Roy R MarzoDepartment of Community Medicine, International Medical School, Management and Science University, Shah Alam, Malaysia.
Rajeev ShresthaDepartment of Pharmacy, District Hospital Lamjung, Besisahar, Nepal.
Binaya SapkotaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nobel College, Affiliated to Pokhara University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Swosti AcharyaNepal Health Research and Innovation Foundation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Nita ShresthaNepal Health Research and Innovation Foundation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Mandip PokharelVennue Foundation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Absar AhmadDepartment of Community Medicine, Manipal Tata Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Jamshedpur, India.
Mark E PatalinghugSchool of Criminal Justice Education, J.H. Cerilles State College, Zamboanga, Philippines.
Farzana RahmanAdministration and Research, Bangladesh National Nutrition Council, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Zahir R SalimCollege of Business Administration, International University of Business Agriculture and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Burcu K BicerDepartment of Medical Education and Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Masoud LotfizadehDepartment of Community Health, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahr-e Kord, Iran.
Baniissa WegdanCollege of Health Sciences/Nursing Department, Sharjah Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Edlaine F de Moura VillelaPublic Policies, Education and Communication, Disease Control Coordination, São Paulo State Health Department, São Paulo, Brazil.
Kittisak JermsittiparsertFaculty of Administrative, Economic and Social Sciences, University of City Island, Northern Cyprus, Turkey.
Nouran A HamzaMedical Agency for Research and Statistics, Giza, Egypt.
Marina R SaleebDepartment of Biostatistics, Medical Agency for Research and Statistics, Giza, Egypt.
Titik RespatiFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Islam Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia.
Susan FitriyanaFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Islam Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia.
Sudip BhattacharyaAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, India.
Petra HeidlerDepartment for Economy and Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University for Continuing Education Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria.
Sikandar A QalatiSchool of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Yadanar AungMedical Statistics Division, Department of Medical Research, Ministry of Health, Myanmar, Myanmar.
Khadijah AbidDepartment of Public Health, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan.
Tayachew A AbejeDepartment of Biology MSc. in Genetics, Mizan Tepi University, Tepi, Ethiopia.
Ashmita PokhrelDepartment of Nursing, Lumbini Medical College & Teaching Hospital, Tansen, Nepal.
Rohullah RoienMedical Research Center, Kateb University, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Isabel KingDepartment of Exercise Physiology, School of Health and Behavioral Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia.
Tin Tin SuGlobal Public Health, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Several studies exhibited varying reports of perception toward vaccine effectiveness, vaccine hesitancy, and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines. As this fluctuated with evidence generation, this study explored the perception toward vaccine effectiveness in rural and urban communities among various countries. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted online from April to August 2021 using convenience sampling among people from different countries approved by the Asia Metropolitan University Medical Research and Ethics. We adapted the questionnaire from the World Health Organization's (WHO) survey tool and guidance on COVID-19. The logistic regression models were performed to show perception toward vaccine effectiveness. Results: A total of 5,673 participants responded to the online survey. Overall, 64% of participants agreed that the vaccine effectively controlled viral spread, and 23% agreed that there was no need for vaccination if others were vaccinated. Males had 14% higher odds of believing that there was no need for vaccination. Less social media users had 39% higher odds of developing the belief that there is no need for vaccination than all other people vaccinated. Conclusion: People's perceptions toward vaccine acceptance have fluctuated with the information flow in various social media and the severity of COVID-19 cases. Therefore, it is important that the current scenario of peoples' perception toward vaccine acceptance and determinants affecting the acceptance are explored to promote the vaccination approach against COVID-19 prevention and transmission effectively.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMalePerceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccine EfficacyCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesCOVID-19global studyperception towards vaccine effectivenesspredictorsvaccine acceptance

Identifiers

PMID36225763
PMCPMC9548880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.