ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022
Incidence of Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Venetoclax and Azacitidine.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Higher-dose venetoclax with measurable residual disease-guided azacitidine discontinuation in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.Haematologica · 2023Trial
- Real-World Experience with Venetoclax Treatment for Newly-Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Japan (VENUS Study): An Interim Analysis Focusing on Neutropenia Management.Oncology and therapy · 2025Article
- Treatment outcomes and safety of reduced‑dose venetoclax plus antifungal agents to treat acute myeloid leukemia: A single hospital experience in Taiwan.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Invasive Fungal Disease Associated With Targeted Agents for Acute Myeloid Leukaemia: A Systematic Review.EJHaem · 2025Review
- Real-world outcomes of azacitidine plus venetoclax in acute myeloid leukemia: a multicenter retrospective cohort study from Thailand.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2025Article
- Treatment challenges and outcomes of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia from India.Annals of hematology · 2024Article
- Modeling Invasive Aspergillosis Risk for the Application of Prophylaxis Strategies.Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Review
- High-Risk Neutropenic Fever and Invasive Fungal Diseases in Patients with Hematological Malignancies.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- The Role of Venetoclax in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Past, Present, and Future Directions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Breakthrough Invasive Fungal Infection After Coadministration of Venetoclax and Voriconazole.Open forum infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Article
- Outcomes of antifungal prophylaxis for newly diagnosed AML patients treated with a hypomethylating agent and venetoclax.Leukemia & lymphoma · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor prognosis, particularly in elderly patients with comorbidities. Combining azacitidine (AZA) with BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) demonstrated significant improvement in outcomes for newly-diagnosed AML patients compared to AZA alone. However, this regimen is myelosuppressive, and the incidence of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) and impact of antifungal prophylaxis are not well defined. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated newly-diagnosed AML patients treated with VEN/AZA at the University of Colorado Hospital from January 2014 to August 2020. Patients with history of prior IFI were excluded. Primary outcome was IFI incidence during VEN/AZA therapy. χ Results: 144 VEN/AZA-treated AML patients were included in the study. 25 (17%) patients developed IFI: 8% (n = 2) "proven," 24% (n = 6) "probable," and 68% (n = 17) "possible" per European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium criteria. There was no statistically significant association between IFI incidence with age, sex, or European LeukemiaNet classification. 10 patients received antifungal prophylaxis; none developed IFI. IFI incidence rate per 1000 patient-days was greatest 0-9 days after starting VEN/AZA, at 8.39. Conclusions: Incidence of "proven" and "probable" IFI in our VEN/AZA-treated AML cohort was 5.6%, in-line with incidence rates reported by recent similar studies. Furthermore, IFI incidence decreased as days from starting VEN/AZA therapy increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.