ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022
An empirical assessment of financial literacy and behavioral biases on investment decision: Fresh evidence from small investor perception.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Addressing financial biases in university undergraduates: Unveiling connections with knowledge, behaviours and attitudes.PloS one · 2025Article
- The Impact of Family Wealth on Asset Return: A Moderated Chain Median Model Partially Explaining Wealth Inequality.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Retracted: Unveiling the synergy: Green finance, technological innovation, green energy, and carbon neutrality.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Nexus between energy efficiency, green investment, urbanization and environmental quality: Evidence from MENA region.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2024-08-01Concerns/Issues about Data · Euphemisms for Plagiarism · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Plagiarism of/in Article ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To have enough financial literacy, an investor must be able to make intelligent investment choices, and on the other hand, the heuristic bias, the framing effect, cognitive illusions, and herd mentality are all variables that contribute to the formation of behavioral biases, also known as illogical conduct, in the decision-making process. The current research looks specifically at behavioral biases and financial literacy influence investment choices, particularly on stock market investment. For the research, a representative sample of 450 individual investors was evaluated. A structured questionnaire was designed using the Likert's scale method to elicit the research variables, and the data acquired were analyzed using the SEM method. According to the findings, there was a statistically significant link between heuristic bias and the development of behavioral bias in decision-making. Nevertheless, cognitive illusions, the herd mentality, and the framing effect all have a deleterious impact on behavioral biases. In addition, investors often adhere to heuristic biases rather than other irrational strategies when making investment judgments. Therefore, individual investors' financial literacy level greatly influences the choices made about investments in the stock market.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.