Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36225478›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Efficacy of Dengue Vaccines in the Prevention of Severe Dengue in Children: A Systematic Review.

Paul Foucambert, Faith D Esbrand, Sana Zafar, Venkatesh Panthangi, Adrienne R Cyril Kurupp, Anjumol Raju, Gaurav Luthra, Mahrukh Shahbaz, Halah Almatooq, Safeera Khan

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Recommendations for dengue vaccine implementation in the elderly population.Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy · 2025
    Review
  5. Evidence map of strategies for preventing and controllingRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul FoucambertInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Faith D EsbrandInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Sana ZafarInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Venkatesh PanthangiInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Adrienne R Cyril KuruppPediatrics, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Anjumol RajuPediatrics, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Gaurav LuthraInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Mahrukh ShahbazInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Halah AlmatooqDermatology, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Safeera KhanInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue is a vector-borne disease caused by the dengue virus (DENV) and is a major health concern worldwide, particularly in regions of endemic disease. Dengue usually presents as a self-limited febrile illness. In some cases, more severe forms with hemorrhage and shock can occur, and children are especially prone to develop it. These forms can be lethal without appropriate management, and no antiviral treatment exists today. In the absence of a curative treatment for dengue, its clinical prevention remains essential. One vaccine - the chimeric yellow fever-dengue-tetravalent dengue vaccine (CYD-TDV) - has been approved for use in some populations, and several others are currently in development, including Takeda's tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate (TAK-003). This study is a systematic review of the current literature realized to evaluate the efficacy of the dengue vaccines in preventing severe dengue in children. This review focuses on the vaccines CYD-TDV and TAK-003. This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were the databases used to find the relevant data. The articles were selected using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, and quality appraisal was realized with standardized quality assessment tools. Overall, our study shows that the dengue vaccines CYD-TDV and TAK-003 confer protection against severe dengue in children. Some distinctions exist depending on the vaccine type, the age, and the dengue serostatus of patients. While demonstrating encouraging results, this review also emphasizes the need for more in-depth studies about the safety and efficacy of dengue vaccines.

Indexed as

denguedengue feverdengue hemorrhagic feverdengue infectiondengue shock syndromedengue tetravalent vaccinedengue vaccinationdengue vaccinedengvaxiasevere dengue

Identifiers

PMID36225478
PMCPMC9542041
OpenAlexW4295007894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.