Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36225409›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

A Case of Frosted Branch Angiitis in the Age of Polymerase Chain Reaction: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Considerations.

Moises Enghelberg, David I Sierpina

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Moises EnghelbergRetina Service, Loma Linda University Eye Institute, Loma Linda, USA.
David I SierpinaOphthalmology, Loma Linda University Eye Institute, Loma Linda, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To describe a unique case highlighting the limitations and caveats of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) in the diagnosis of posterior infectious uveitis, specifically frosted branch angiitis (FBA), we present a case of FBA in which multiple diagnostic modalities, including mPCR, are inconclusive. A thorough literature review was carried out to discuss the validity of mPCR in the setting of posterior infectious uveitis, the theoretical effect of sample dilution, and to explore a management strategy in these difficult cases. It is known that mPCR has high sensitivity and specificity, with a low false negative rate. However, the rate of false negatives appears to increase in cases of FBA, and when samples are diluted. In such cases we suggest empiric treatment be initiated and targeted towards microorganisms most likely to be implicated based on exam and history.

Indexed as

frosted branch angiitispcr multiplexreal-time pcr and nucleic acid sequencingretinauveitis

Identifiers

PMID36225409
PMCPMC9535203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.