Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36225222›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2022

Scalp block for postoperative pain after craniotomy: A meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

Yanting Chen, Jianqiang Ni, Xiang Li, Jialei Zhou, Gang Chen

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05763836 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

Comparison of the Analgesic Effects of Scalp Nerve Block and Intravenous Ibuprofen Applications Under the Guidance of Nociception Level Index (NoL) in Patients Undergoing Elective Supratentorial Craniotomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnkara UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled102ConditionsSupratentorial Brain TumorArmsIbuprofen 800 Mg in 8 mL INTRAVENOUS INJECTION [Caldolor], Scalp nerve block
NCT06720285 early_phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy of Regional Scalp Block Local Anesthesia as Preemptive Analgesia in Craniotomy Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitas AirlanggaRan2023 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsScalp Nerve Block, Craniotomy SurgeryArmsnerve block with 0.5% ropivacaine, General anesthesia and opioids (fentanyl, propofol, rocuronium)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Regional scalp block for post-craniotomy pain management in children: a scoping review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yanting ChenDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Jianqiang NiDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Xiang LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Jialei ZhouDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Gang ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CNSoochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pain after craniotomy is an important clinical concern because it might lead to brain hyperemia and elevated intracranial pressure. Considering the side effects of opioid, several studies have been conducted to investigate the effect of local anesthetics, especially the scalp block, on postoperative pain. However, the strength of evidence supporting this practice for postoperative pain after craniotomy was unclear and the best occasion of scalp block was also not identified. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and the best occasion of scalp block for postoperative pain after craniotomy. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases from database inception to October 10, 2021 were searched for all randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of scalp block on postoperative pain after craniotomy. Data were assessed by StataMP 16 software. Results: A total of 12 studies were included. A random-effect model was used to analyze all data. Patients under scalp block earned fewer scores than the non-scalp block group in visual analogue scale at the very early period (MD = -1.97, 95% CI = -3.07 to -0.88), early period (MD = -1.84, 95% CI = -2.95 to -0.73) and intermediate period (MD = -1.16, 95% CI = -1.84 to -0.49). Scalp block could also significantly prolong the time of the first request of rescue analgesia and reduce the use of additional analgesics without a significant difference in the incidence of complications. Subgroup analysis showed there was no significant difference in analgesia effect between pre-incision scalp block and post-incision scalp block in all periods. Conclusion: Scalp block could lead to lower pain intensity scores, more time of the first request of rescue analgesia, and fewer analgesic drugs applied in the first 12 h after craniotomy. There was no significant difference between pre-incision and post-incision scalp block in the occurrence and severity of postoperative pain.

Indexed as

craniotomymeta-analysisnerve blockpostoperative painvisual analogue scale

Identifiers

PMID36225222
PMCPMC9550001
OpenAlexW4297201402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.