Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36225212›Full record

ReviewFood chemistry: X2022

The role of emerging technologies in the dehydration of berries: Quality, bioactive compounds, and shelf life.

Mirian Pateiro, Márcio Vargas-Ramella, Daniel Franco, Adriano Gomes da Cruz, Gökhan Zengin, Manoj Kumar, Kuldeep Dhama, José M Lorenzo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food chemistry: X, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Consumer Acceptance ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluation of Blue Honeysuckle Berries (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mirian PateiroCentro Tecnológico de la Carne de Galicia, Rúa Galicia N° 4, Parque Tecnológico de Galicia, San Cibrao das Viñas, 32900 Ourense, Spain.
Márcio Vargas-RamellaCentro Tecnológico de la Carne de Galicia, Rúa Galicia N° 4, Parque Tecnológico de Galicia, San Cibrao das Viñas, 32900 Ourense, Spain.
Daniel FrancoCentro Tecnológico de la Carne de Galicia, Rúa Galicia N° 4, Parque Tecnológico de Galicia, San Cibrao das Viñas, 32900 Ourense, Spain.
Adriano Gomes da CruzInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (IFRJ), Departamento de Alimentos, 20270-021 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Gökhan ZenginDepartment of Biology, Science Faculty, Selcuk University, Campus, Konya, Turkey.
Manoj KumarChemical and Biochemical Processing Division, ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Mumbai 400019, India.
Kuldeep DhamaDivision of Pathology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute (IVRI), Izatnagar 243122, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
José M LorenzoCentro Tecnológico de la Carne de Galicia, Rúa Galicia N° 4, Parque Tecnológico de Galicia, San Cibrao das Viñas, 32900 Ourense, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Berries are among the fruits with the highest nutritional and commercial value. This paper reviews the conventional and emerging dehydration methods most commonly used as postharvest treatment and discusses their efficacy in maintaining and/or improving the nutritional and functional qualities of dried berries. The characteristics of the conventional methods (

Indexed as

BerryBioactive compoundsDehydration technologyDrying methodFruit qualityPhenolic compounds

Identifiers

PMID36225212
PMCPMC9550524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.