ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2023
A reinforcement learning-based hybrid modeling framework for bioprocess kinetics identification.
Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Grey-box modeling framework for consolidated bioprocessing systems: an endpoint-guided approach.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2026Article
- The dynamic growth of bacterial cultures: real-time Bayesian estimation of substrate uptake rates in fed-batch fermentations of E. coli.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2026Article
- CGT 4.0: a distant dream or inevitable future? Smart process automation is critical to make efficient scalability of CGT manufacturing a reality.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Machine learning: an advancement in biochemical engineering.Biotechnology letters · 2024Review
- Building blocks needed for mechanistic modeling of bioprocesses: A critical review based on protein production by CHO cells.Metabolic engineering communications · 2024Review
- A reinforcement learning-based hybrid modeling framework for bioprocess kinetics identification.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2023Article
- A recurrent neural network for soft sensor development using CHO stable pools in fed-batch process for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein production as a vaccine antigen.Biotechnology progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Constructing predictive models to simulate complex bioprocess dynamics, particularly time-varying (i.e., parameters varying over time) and history-dependent (i.e., current kinetics dependent on historical culture conditions) behavior, has been a longstanding research challenge. Current advances in hybrid modeling offer a solution to this by integrating kinetic models with data-driven techniques. This article proposes a novel two-step framework: first (i) speculate and combine several possible kinetic model structures sourced from process and phenomenological knowledge, then (ii) identify the most likely kinetic model structure and its parameter values using model-free Reinforcement Learning (RL). Specifically, Step 1 collates feasible history-dependent model structures, then Step 2 uses RL to simultaneously identify the correct model structure and the time-varying parameter trajectories. To demonstrate the performance of this framework, a range of in-silico case studies were carried out. The results show that the proposed framework can efficiently construct high-fidelity models to quantify both time-varying and history-dependent kinetic behaviors while minimizing the risks of over-parametrization and over-fitting. Finally, the primary advantages of the proposed framework and its limitation were thoroughly discussed in comparison to other existing hybrid modeling and model structure identification techniques, highlighting the potential of this framework for general bioprocess modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.