Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36225094›Full record

ArticleAnimal models and experimental medicine2022

Different coding characteristics between flight and freezing in dorsal periaqueductal gray of mice during exposure to innate threats.

Denghui Liu, Shouhao Li, Liqing Ren, Xinyu Liu, Xiaoyuan Li, Zhenlong Wang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal models and experimental medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tail-rattling in rodents: more than a threat display.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Denghui LiuSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5376-1979
Shouhao LiSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7575-9244
Liqing RenSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3192-1262
Xinyu LiuSchool of Intelligent Manufacturing, Huanghuai University, Zhumadian, China.
Xiaoyuan LiSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6238-5095
Zhenlong WangSchool of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5946-2806
Zhengzhou University · CNHuanghuai University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlight and freezing are two vital defensive behaviors that mice display to avoid natural enemies. When they are exposed to innate threats, visual cues are processed and transmitted by the visual system into the emotional nuclei and finally transmitted to the periaqueductal gray (PAG) to induce defensive behaviors. However, how the dorsal PAG (dPAG) encodes the two defensive behaviors is unclear.

methodsMulti-array electrodes were implanted in the dPAG nuclei of C57BL/6 mice. Two kinds of visual stimuli (looming and sweeping) were used to induce defensive behaviors in mice. Neural signals under different defense behaviors were recorded, and the encoding characteristics of the two behaviors were extracted and analyzed from spike firing and frequency oscillations. Finally, synchronization of neural activity during the defense process was analyzed.

resultsThe neural activity between flight and freezing behaviors showed different firing patterns, and the differences in the inter-spike interval distribution were mainly reflected in the 2-10 ms period. The frequency band activities under both defensive behaviors were concentrated in the theta band; the active frequency of flight was ~8 to 10 Hz, whereas that of freezing behavior was ~6 to 8 Hz. The network connection density under both defense behaviors was significantly higher than the period before and after defensive behavior occurred, indicating that there was a high synchronization of neural activity during the defense process.

conclusionsThe dPAG nuclei of mice have different coding features between flight and freezing behaviors; during strong looming stimulation, fast neuro-instinctive decision making is required while encountering weak sweeping stimulation, and computable planning late behavior is predicted in the early stage. The frequency band activities under both defensive behaviors were concentrated in the theta band. There was a high synchronization of neural activity during the defense process, which may be a key factor triggering different defensive behaviors.

Indexed as

EmotionsPeriaqueductal GrayAnimalsFreezingMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRatsRats, WistarC57BL/6 micedorsal periaqueductal grayflight and freezinginnate threatsneural coding

Identifiers

PMID36225094
PMCPMC9773308
OpenAlexW4306155688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.