Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36224659›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2022

Quantitative measurement of resistance force and subsequent attenuation during passive isokinetic extension of the wrist in patients with mild to moderate spasticity after stroke.

Kentaro Kawamura, Seiji Etoh, Tomokazu Noma, Ryota Hayashi, Yuiko Jonoshita, Keisuke Natsume, Seiichi Niidome, Yong Yu, Megumi Shimodozono

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kentaro KawamuraDepartment of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1, Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima City, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan. kentarok@m.kufm.kagoshima-u.ac.jp.
Seiji EtohDepartment of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1, Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima City, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan.
Tomokazu NomaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Nihon Fukushi University, Aichi, Japan.
Ryota HayashiDepartment of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Okayama University of Science, Okayama, Japan.
Yuiko JonoshitaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Kagoshima University Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
Keisuke NatsumeDepartment of Rehabilitation, Kagoshima University Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
Seiichi NiidomeDepartment of Rehabilitation, Kagoshima University Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
Yong YuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.
Megumi ShimodozonoDepartment of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1, Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima City, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan.
Kagoshima University · JPKagoshima University Hospital · JPNihon Fukushi University · JPOkayama University of Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpasticity is evaluated by measuring the increased resistance to passive movement, primarily by manual methods. Few options are available to measure spasticity in the wrist more objectively. Furthermore, no studies have investigated the force attenuation following increased resistance. The aim of this study was to conduct a safe quantitative evaluation of wrist passive extension stiffness in stroke survivors with mild to moderate spastic paresis using a custom motor-controlled device. Furthermore, we wanted to clarify whether the changes in the measured values could quantitatively reflect the spastic state of the flexor muscles involved in the wrist stiffness of the patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsResistance forces were measured in 17 patients during repetitive passive extension of the wrist at velocities of 30, 60, and 90 deg/s. The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the wrist and finger flexors was also assessed by two skilled therapists and their scores were averaged (i.e., average MAS) for analysis. Of the fluctuation of resistance, we focused on the damping just after the peak forces and used these for our analysis. A repeated measures analysis of variance was conducted to assess velocity-dependence. Correlations between MAS and damping parameters were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation.

resultsThe damping force and normalized value calculated from damping part showed significant velocity-dependent increases. There were significant correlations (ρ = 0.53-0.56) between average MAS for wrist and the normalized value of the damping part at 90 deg/s. The correlations became stronger at 60 deg/s and 90 deg/s when the MAS for finger flexors was added to that for wrist flexors (ρ = 0.65-0.68).

conclusionsThis custom-made isokinetic device could quantitatively evaluate spastic changes in the wrist and finger flexors simultaneously by focusing on the damping part, which may reflect the decrease in resistance we perceive when manually assessing wrist spasticity using MAS. Trial registration UMIN Clinical Trial Registry, as UMIN000030672, on July 4, 2018.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationHumansMuscle SpasticityWristWrist JointBiomechanicsFingerForce attenuationMuscle spasticityObjective assessmentRehabilitationResistance forceStrokeWrist

Identifiers

PMID36224659
PMCPMC9559851
OpenAlexW4304776298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.