Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36224656›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Barriers and recommendations for a cervical cancer screening program among women in low-resource settings in Lagos Nigeria: a qualitative study.

Tope Olubodun, Mobolanle Rasheedat Balogun, Abimbola Kofoworola Odeyemi, Oluwakemi Ololade Odukoya, Adedoyin Oyeyimika Ogunyemi, Oluchi Joan Kanma-Okafor, Ifeoma Peace Okafor, Ayodeji Bamidele Olubodun, Oluwatoyin Olanrewaju Progress Ogundele, Babatunde Ogunnowo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tope OlubodunDepartment of Community Health and Primary Care, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Surulere, Lagos, Nigeria. oluboduntope@gmail.com.
Mobolanle Rasheedat BalogunDepartment of Community Health and Primary Care, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Surulere, Lagos, Nigeria.
Abimbola Kofoworola OdeyemiDepartment of Community Health and Primary Care, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Surulere, Lagos, Nigeria.
Oluwakemi Ololade OdukoyaDepartment of Community Health and Primary Care, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Surulere, Lagos, Nigeria.
Adedoyin Oyeyimika OgunyemiDepartment of Community Health and Primary Care, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Surulere, Lagos, Nigeria.
Oluchi Joan Kanma-OkaforDepartment of Community Health and Primary Care, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Surulere, Lagos, Nigeria.
Ifeoma Peace OkaforDepartment of Community Health and Primary Care, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Surulere, Lagos, Nigeria.
Ayodeji Bamidele OlubodunOlabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital, Sagamu, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Oluwatoyin Olanrewaju Progress OgundeleLadiya hospital. Sabon Gari, Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria.
Babatunde OgunnowoDepartment of Community Health and Primary Care, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Surulere, Lagos, Nigeria.
Akin OsibogunDepartment of Community Health and Primary Care, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Surulere, Lagos, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women globally despite being a largely treatable and preventable malignancy. Developing countries account for over 80% of all new cases. Women residing in low-resource settings such as those residing in slums have a higher risk of cervical cancer, and lower uptake of cervical cancer screening. Diverse barriers influence the uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in low-resource settings.

objectivesThis qualitative study was done prior to the introduction of a cervical cancer screening program in two slum areas in Lagos Nigeria and explored women's knowledge about cervical cancer, and their perceived barriers and recommendations for the program.

methodFour focus group discussions(FGD) were conducted among 35 women between the ages of 21-65 years residing in two urban slums in Lagos, Nigeria from February to April 2019. Each FGD was limited to 8-10 participants of women of similar ages. Voice recordings were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was done.

resultsMost of the women were not aware of cervical cancer and none knew the symptoms or risk factors of cervical cancer. The participants felt that the cervical cancer screening program would be well accepted in the community, however, expressed concerns about the cost of the screening test and the sex of the person performing the test. The recommendations proffered for a successful cervical cancer screening program include; reducing the cost of the test or providing the test free of charge, having people that speak the local language as part of the team, using female health care providers, using a private location within the community or nearby primary health center, and publicizing the program with the use of SMS, phone calls, town crier, and health talks. It was recommended that organizing health education sessions would help improve women's poorly perceived susceptibility to cervical cancer.

conclusionInterventions to increase uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in low resource settings need to improve knowledge of cervical cancer and address barriers to cervical cancer screening such as cost, distance, and as much as possible, sex of the healthcare provider should be considered.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNigeriaQualitative ResearchYoung AdultBarriersCervical cancer screeningLow-resource settingsPap smearQualitativeRecommendationsSlum

Identifiers

PMID36224656
PMCPMC9560022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.