Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36224564›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Structural determinants of tailored behavioral health services for sexual and gender minorities in the United States, 2010 to 2020: a panel analysis.

Cory J Cascalheira, Emily C Helminen, Thomas J Shaw, Jillian R Scheer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Heterogeneity in Protective Factors as a Buffer for Unique Risk Factors and Daily Smoking Among Transgender Adults.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cory J CascalheiraDepartment of Counseling & Educational Psychology, New Mexico State University, 1780 E University Ave, Las Cruces, NM, 88003, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5780-3101
Emily C HelminenDepartment of Psychology, Syracuse University, 414 Huntington Hall, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3884-9603
Thomas J ShawDepartment of Psychology, Syracuse University, 414 Huntington Hall, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9970-8428
Jillian R ScheerDepartment of Psychology, Syracuse University, 414 Huntington Hall, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA. jrscheer@syr.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7311-5904
Syracuse University · USNew Mexico State University · US

Funding

RISE PROGRAM AT NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITYR25GM061222 · NIGMS · NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY LAS CRUCES · PI HOUSTON, JESSICA PEREA, REDDI, LAKSHMI · 2000 to 2022
$21.3M
Testing a Biopsychosocial Model of Violence Exposure, Minority Stressors, and Hazardous Drinking among Sexual Minority WomenK01AA028239 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND · PI SCHEER, JILLIAN R · 2021 to 2025
$1.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA028239NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM061222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch indicates that tailored programming for sexual and gender minority (SGM; e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer) people, compared to non-tailored programming, is effective for reducing the disproportionate health burden SGM people experience relative to the general population. However, the availability of SGM-tailored programming is often over-reported and inconsistent across behavioral health (i.e., substance use and mental health) facilities in the United States (U.S.).

methodsUsing panel analysis, the National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), and the National Mental Health Services Survey (N-MHSS), this study examines structural stigma and government funding as two structural determinants affecting the availability of SGM-tailored programming in the U.S.

resultsResults indicated that from 2010 to 2020, reductions in structural stigma (i.e., increases in state-level supportive SGM policies) were positively associated with increases in the proportion of substance use treatment facilities offering SGM-tailored programming. This effect was significant after controlling for over-reporting of SGM-tailored programming and time- and state-specific heterogeneity. On average, the effect of reduced structural stigma resulted in approximately two new SGM-tailored programs in the short term and about 31 new SGM-tailored programs in the long term across U.S. substance use treatment facilities. Structural stigma did not predict the availability of SGM-tailored programming in mental health treatment facilities. Government funding was not significant in either data set. However, without correcting for over-reporting, government funding became a significant predictor of the availability of SGM-tailored programming at substance use treatment facilities.

conclusionsBecause SGM-tailored programming facilitates access to healthcare and the current study found longitudinal associations between structural stigma and the availability of SGM-tailored programming in substance use treatment facilities, our findings support claims that reducing structural stigma increases access to behavioral health treatment specifically and healthcare generally among SGM people. This study's findings also indicate the importance of correcting for over-reporting of SGM-tailored programming, raising concerns about how respondents perceive the N-SSATS and N-MHSS questions about SGM-tailored programming. Implications for future research using the N-SSATS and N-MHSS data and for public health policy are discussed.

Indexed as

Sexual and Gender MinoritiesSubstance-Related DisordersFemaleGender IdentityHealth ServicesHumansSexual BehaviorUnited StatesHealthcare accessLGBTQLongitudinalMental healthN-MHSSN-SSATSPanel dataStigmaStructural stigmaSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID36224564
PMCPMC9556150
OpenAlexW4304809187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.