Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36224524›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

Treatment outcomes in recurrent versus de novo metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a real world study.

Laura Miotke, Christopher Nevala-Plagemann, Jian Ying, Vaia Florou, Benjamin Haaland, Ignacio Garrido-Laguna

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prognostic significance ofAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura MiotkeDivision of Medical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. laura.miotke@hsc.utah.edu.
Christopher Nevala-PlagemannDivision of Medical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Jian YingDepartment of Population Health Sciences, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Vaia FlorouDivision of Medical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Benjamin HaalandDepartment of Population Health Sciences, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Ignacio Garrido-LagunaDivision of Medical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Huntsman Cancer Institute · US

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jared P Rutter · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014NCI NIH HHS P30CA042014-23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA majority of patients undergoing curative intent surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) will unfortunately develop recurrent disease. Treatment outcomes for patients with metastatic disease remain suboptimal. In this study, we evaluated clinical outcomes of patients with recurrent PDAC who received systemic therapy and compared outcomes to patients with de novo metastatic PDAC undergoing systemic therapy.

methodsPatients diagnosed with metastatic PDAC between 2014 and 2019 were included using a real-world database. Patients were characterized as either de novo or recurrent based on the date of metastatic diagnosis and history of surgical resection. Overall survival (OS) was summarized within groups via Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and compared using Cox proportional hazards models.

resultsWe included 5170 patients with metastatic PDAC, of which 1101 (21.3%) were classified as having recurrent disease. Median OS for the recurrent group was significantly greater at 10.8 m (95% CI 9.9-11.7) than in the de novo group at 7.3 m (95% CI 7.0-7.7, p < 0.001). We did not observe a significant difference in OS based on when patients recurred after surgery: 10.0 m (95% CI 8.7-11) within six months of surgery versus 11.6 m (95% CI 10-12, p = 0.256) greater than six months from surgery.

conclusionsThese data support the inclusion of patients with recurrent PDAC in clinical trials for advanced disease, including those who develop recurrent disease within six months of surgery. Due to observed differences in survival, randomization should be stratified by disease presentation (recurrent vs de novo).

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDe NovoOverall survivalPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaReal-world outcomesRecurrent

Identifiers

PMID36224524
PMCPMC9554966
OpenAlexW4304632382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.