Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36224520›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2022

Comparison of unweighted and item response theory-based weighted sum scoring for the Nine-Questions Depression-Rating Scale in the Northern Thai Dialect.

Suttipong Kawilapat, Benchalak Maneeton, Narong Maneeton, Sukon Prasitwattanaseree, Thoranin Kongsuk, Suwanna Arunpongpaisal, Jintana Leejongpermpoon, Supattra Sukhawaha, Patrinee Traisathit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Prevalence of Internet Addiction Among Thai Pharmacy Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Suttipong KawilapatDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, 239 Huaykaew Road, Suthep, Muang, 50200, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Benchalak ManeetonDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Narong ManeetonDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Sukon PrasitwattanasereeDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, 239 Huaykaew Road, Suthep, Muang, 50200, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Thoranin KongsukPrasrimahabhodi Psychiatric Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.
Suwanna ArunpongpaisalDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Jintana LeejongpermpoonPrasrimahabhodi Psychiatric Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.
Supattra SukhawahaPrasrimahabhodi Psychiatric Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.
Patrinee TraisathitDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, 239 Huaykaew Road, Suthep, Muang, 50200, Chiang Mai, Thailand. patrinee.t@cmu.ac.th.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Nine-Questions Depression-Rating Scale (9Q) has been developed as an alternative assessment tool for assessing the severity of depressive symptoms in Thai adults. The traditional unweighted sum scoring approach does not account for differences in the loadings of the items on the actual severity. Therefore, we developed an Item Response Theory (IRT)-based weighted sum scoring approach to provide a scoring method that is more precise than the unweighted sum score.

methodsSecondary data from a study on the criterion-related validity of the 9Q in the northern Thai dialect was used in this study. All participants were interviewed to obtain demographic data and screened/evaluated for major depressive disorder and the severity of the associated depressive symptoms, followed by diagnosis by a psychiatrist for major depressive disorder. IRT models were used to estimate the discrimination and threshold parameters. Differential item functioning (DIF) of responses to each item between males and females was compared using likelihood-ratio tests. The IRT-based weighed sum scores of the individual items are defined as the linear combination of individual response weighted with the discrimination and threshold parameters divided by the plausible maximum score based on the graded-response model (GRM) for the 9Q score (9Q-GRM) or the nominal-response model (NRM) for categorical combinations of the intensity and frequency of symptoms from the 9Q responses (9QSF-NRM). The performances of the two scoring procedures were compared using relative precision.

resultsOf the 1,355 participants, 1,000 and 355 participants were randomly selected for the developmental and validation group for the IRT-based weighted scoring, respectively. the gender-related DIF were presented for items 2 and 5 for the 9Q-GRM, while most items (except for items 3 and 6) for the 9QSF-NRM, which could be used to separately estimate the parameters between genders. The 9Q-GRM model accounting for DIF had a higher precision (16.7%) than the unweighted sum-score approach. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that weighted sum scoring with the IRT parameters can improve the scoring when using 9Q to measure the severity of the depressive symptoms in Thai adults. Accounting for DIF between the genders resulted in higher precision for IRT-based weighted scoring.

Indexed as

DepressionMajor Depressive DisorderAdultFemaleHumansLanguageMalePsychometricsResearch DesignThailandDepressive symptomsDifferential item functioningGraded-response modelItem response theoryNine-Questions Depression-Rating ScaleNominal-response model

Identifiers

PMID36224520
PMCPMC9555165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.