Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36224234›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

The effect of the surgical approach and cochlear implant electrode on the structural integrity of the cochlea in human temporal bones.

Saad Jwair, Huib Versnel, Robert J Stokroos, Hans G X M Thomeer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cochlear integrity and scalar translocation assessment after cochlear implantation based on three-dimensional anatomical reconstructions.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Saad JwairDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, P.O. Box 85500, 3508, Utrecht, GA, The Netherlands. s.jwair@umcutrecht.nl.
Huib VersnelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, P.O. Box 85500, 3508, Utrecht, GA, The Netherlands.
Robert J StokroosDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, P.O. Box 85500, 3508, Utrecht, GA, The Netherlands.
Hans G X M ThomeerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, P.O. Box 85500, 3508, Utrecht, GA, The Netherlands.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear implants (CI) restore hearing of severely hearing-impaired patients. Although this auditory prosthesis is widely considered to be very successful, structural cochlear trauma during cochlear implantation is an important problem, reductions of which could help to improve hearing outcomes and to broaden selection criteria. The surgical approach in cochlear implantation, i.e. round window (RW) or cochleostomy (CO), and type of electrode-array, perimodiolar (PM) or lateral wall (LW), are variables that might influence the probability of severe trauma. We investigated the effect of these two variables on scalar translocation (STL), a specific type of severe trauma. Thirty-two fresh frozen human cadaveric ears were evenly distributed over four groups receiving either RW or CO approach, and either LW or PM array. Conventional radiological multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) was compared with a reconstruction method that uncoils the spiral shape of the cochlea (UCR). Histological analysis showed that RW with PM array had STL rate of 87% (7/8), CO approach with LW array 75% (6/8), RW approach with LW array 50% (4/8) and CO approach with PM array 29% (2/7). STL assessment using UCR showed a higher inter-observer and histological agreement (91 and 94% respectively), than that using MPR (69 and 74% respectively). In particular, LW array positions were difficult to assess with MPR. In conclusion, the interaction between surgical approach and type of array should be preoperatively considered in cochlear implant surgery. UCR technique is advised for radiological assessment of CI positions, and in general it might be useful for pathologies involving the inner ear or other complex shaped bony tubular structures.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsCochleaHumansRound Window, EarTemporal Bone

Identifiers

PMID36224234
PMCPMC9556579
OpenAlexW4304689338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.