ArticleScientific reports2022
Five material tissue decomposition by dual energy computed tomography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accurate iodine quantification and residual error reduction with principal component analysis multimaterial decomposition using spectral CT.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Costal cartilage mimics urate on DECT.Skeletal radiology · 2025Article
- Recovery and Characterization of Tissue Properties from Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting with Exchange.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Multimaterial decomposition in dual-energy CT for characterization of clots from acute ischemic stroke patients.European radiology experimental · 2024Article
- Quantitative energy spectrum CT in differential diagnosis of aldosterone-producing adenoma and cortisol-producing adenoma.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The separation of mixtures of substances into their individual components plays an important role in many areas of science. In medical imaging, one method is the established analysis using dual-energy computed tomography. However, when analyzing mixtures consisting of more than three individual basis materials, a physical limit is reached that no longer allows this standard analysis. In addition, the X-ray attenuation coefficients of chemically complicated basis materials may not be known and also cannot be determined by other or previous analyses. To address these issues, we developed a novel theoretical approach and algorithm and tested it on samples prepared in the laboratory as well as on ex-vivo medical samples. This method allowed both five-material decomposition and determination or optimization of the X-ray attenuation coefficients of the sample base materials via optimizations of objective functions. After implementation, this new multimodal method was successfully tested on self-mixed samples consisting of the aqueous base solutions iomeprol, eosin Y disodiumsalt, sodium chloride, and pure water. As a first proof of concept of this technique for detailed material decomposition in medicine we analyzed exact percentage composition of ex vivo clots from patients with acute ischemic stroke, using histological analysis as a reference standard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.