Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36224193›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

A conserved enzyme of smut fungi facilitates cell-to-cell extension in the plant bundle sheath.

Bilal Ökmen, Elaine Jaeger, Lena Schilling, Natalie Finke, Amy Klemd, Yoon Joo Lee, Raphael Wemhöner, Markus Pauly, Ulla Neumann, Gunther Doehlemann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The Candidate Effector Cgmas2 Orchestrates Biphasic Infection ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Protein Extraction Methods for Ustilago maydis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Adaptation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bilal ÖkmenInstitute for Plant Sciences, University of Cologne, BioCenter, Zuelpicher Str. 47a, 50674, Cologne, Germany. bilal.oekmen@zmbp.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4729-9973
Elaine JaegerInstitute for Plant Sciences, University of Cologne, BioCenter, Zuelpicher Str. 47a, 50674, Cologne, Germany.
Lena SchillingMax-Planck-Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
Natalie FinkeInstitute for Plant Sciences, University of Cologne, BioCenter, Zuelpicher Str. 47a, 50674, Cologne, Germany.
Amy KlemdMax-Planck-Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, 35043, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8641-5965
Yoon Joo LeeInstitute for Plant Sciences, University of Cologne, BioCenter, Zuelpicher Str. 47a, 50674, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4677-0185
Raphael WemhönerInstitute for Plant Sciences, University of Cologne, BioCenter, Zuelpicher Str. 47a, 50674, Cologne, Germany.
Markus PaulyInstitute for Plant Cell Biology and Biotechnology, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Universitätsstr. 1, D-40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3116-2198
Ulla NeumannCentral Microscopy, Max-Planck-Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829, Cologne, Germany.
Gunther DoehlemannInstitute for Plant Sciences, University of Cologne, BioCenter, Zuelpicher Str. 47a, 50674, Cologne, Germany. g.doehlemann@uni-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7353-8456
University of Cologne · DEMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smut fungi comprise one of the largest groups of fungal plant pathogens causing disease in all cereal crops. They directly penetrate host tissues and establish a biotrophic interaction. To do so, smut fungi secrete a wide range of effector proteins, which suppress plant immunity and modulate cellular functions as well as development of the host, thereby determining the pathogen's lifestyle and virulence potential. The conserved effector Erc1 (enzyme required for cell-to-cell extension) contributes to virulence of the corn smut Ustilago maydis in maize leaves but not on the tassel. Erc1 binds to host cell wall components and displays 1,3-β-glucanase activity, which is required to attenuate β-glucan-induced defense responses. Here we show that Erc1 has a cell type-specific virulence function, being necessary for fungal cell-to-cell extension in the plant bundle sheath and this function is fully conserved in the Erc1 orthologue of the barley pathogen Ustilago hordei.

Indexed as

beta-GlucansUstilagoFungal ProteinsGlucan 1,3-beta-GlucosidasePlant DiseasesZea maysbeta-GlucansFungal ProteinsGlucan 1,3-beta-Glucosidase

Identifiers

PMID36224193
PMCPMC9556619
OpenAlexW4304690844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.