Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36223871›Full record

SynthesisAcademic pediatrics

Community Health Workers in Schools: A Systematic Review.

Michael D Harries, Nuo Xu, Michael S Bertenthal, Viridiana Luna, Mary J Akel, Anna Volerman

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael D HarriesDepartment of Pediatrics (MD Harries, M Bertenthal, A Volerman), University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill. Electronic address: michael.harries@uchospitals.edu.
Nuo XuDepartment of Medicine (N Xu, V Luna, MJ Akel, A Volerman), University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.
Michael S BertenthalDepartment of Pediatrics (MD Harries, M Bertenthal, A Volerman), University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.
Viridiana LunaDepartment of Medicine (N Xu, V Luna, MJ Akel, A Volerman), University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.
Mary J AkelDepartment of Medicine (N Xu, V Luna, MJ Akel, A Volerman), University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.
Anna VolermanDepartment of Pediatrics (MD Harries, M Bertenthal, A Volerman), University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill; Department of Medicine (N Xu, V Luna, MJ Akel, A Volerman), University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.
University of Chicago · US

Funding

Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Ronald T. Ackermann, MARSHALL H CHIN · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
Chicago Asthma School-Directed Child-Centered Assessment and Dissemination of Evidence (CASCADE) ProgramK23HL143128 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI VOLERMAN, ANNA · 2020 to 2024
$985k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL143128NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity health workers (CHWs) are trusted community members who provide health education and care. However, no consensus exists regarding whether community health worker-based interventions are effective within the school setting.

objectiveTo determine outcomes and best practices of school-based community health worker interventions. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CINAHL, and SCOPUS databases. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: This systematic literature review examined articles that described an intervention led by community health workers, targeted children and/or parents, and took place primarily within a Kindergarten-12

participantsCommunity health workers, children, and/or their parents

interventionsSchool-based community health worker programs

resultsOf 1875 articles identified, 13 met inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Of these, 5 described a statistically significant primary outcome. Seven articles provided details regarding community health worker recruitment, training, and roles that would enable reproduction of the intervention. LIMITATIONS: This review focused on interventions in the United States. Bias of individual studies had a wide range of scores (9-21). Heterogeneity of studies also precluded a meta-analysis of primary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY

findingsThe utilization of Community health workers in school-based interventions for children and/or parents is promising. This review identified a lack of detail and uniformity in program presentation, specifically with Community health worker recruitment, training, and roles. A standardized reporting mechanism for Community health worker interventions in schools would better allow for reproducibility and scalability of existing studies.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersSchoolsChildEducational StatusHealth EducationHumansReproducibility of Resultschildrencommunity health workersschools

Identifiers

PMID36223871
PMCPMC9951773
OpenAlexW4303859179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.