ReviewJCO oncology practice2023
The Cup Runneth Over: Treatment Strategies for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Review in JCO oncology practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Novel molecular mechanisms of FLT3 deregulation: from the acute myeloid leukemia experience to therapeutic insights in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Real-World Outcomes of Relapsed/Refractory Core-Binding Factor Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A COMMAND Registry Study.American journal of hematology · 2025Article
- Assessing AML-based risk criteria in patients with accelerated/blast-phase MPN treated with less-intensive therapy.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Discovery of NFκB2-Coordinated Dual Regulation of Mitochondrial and Nuclear Genomes Leads to an Effective Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Treatment approach and outcomes of patients with accelerated/blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms in the current era.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: advances and controversies.Haematologica · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since 2017, the number of agents for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has rapidly expanded. Given the increased therapeutic options, better identification of high-risk subsets of AML and more refined approaches to patient fitness assessment, the decisions surrounding selection of intensive chemotherapy versus lower-intensity treatment have grown increasingly more nuanced. In this review, we present available data for both standard and investigational approaches in the initial treatment of AML using an intensive chemotherapy backbone or a lower-intensity approach. We summarize management strategies in newly diagnosed secondary AML, considerations around allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, and the role of maintenance therapy. Finally, we highlight important areas of future investigation and novel agents that may hold promise in combination with standard therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.