Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36223543›Full record

ArticleJournal of morphology2022

Canine morphometrics as a tool for distinguishing species, sex, and age class in Southern Ocean fur seals.

Liezl E Pretorius, Marthán N Bester, Maëlle Connan, G J Greg Hofmeyr

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of morphology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Liezl E PretoriusDepartment of Zoology and Entomology, Mammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1598-1270
Marthán N BesterDepartment of Zoology and Entomology, Mammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2265-764X
Maëlle ConnanMarine Apex Predator Research Unit, Department of Zoology, Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1308-9118
G J Greg HofmeyrMarine Apex Predator Research Unit, Department of Zoology, Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0283-6058
University of Pretoria · ZABayworld Centre for Research and Education · ZANelson Mandela University · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carcasses resulting from natural mortalities are invaluable for use in scientific studies, provided species, sex, and age class are known. When such data are unavailable, identifying skeletal remains is necessary if one is to use the information contained within samples. Teeth are amongst the best preserved skeletal remains owing to the durability of enamel and dentine. Here, we tested whether external measurements of canines could be used to distinguish two partially sympatric species of Southern Ocean fur seals, the Antarctic Arctocephalus gazella and Sub-Antarctic A. tropicalis fur seals. We also investigated whether the external measurements of canines could be used to determine the age, sex, as well as island of origin of the animals. Eight morphological variables (crown length, root length, crown width, root width, crown thickness, root thickness, total canine length, and count of external surface annular ridges) were recorded from canines of 340 individuals of known species, sex, and island of origin. The count of external annular ridges provided a good estimate of age, which was confirmed by counting the growth layer groups of sectioned teeth, especially for older animals (> 9 years old). External canine measurements proved useful in distinguishing species, as well as sex within and between species, particularly in adult animals. Species were more difficult to distinguish in females than in males. The islands of origin could only be inferred in male Antarctic fur seals. This study indicates that fur seal teeth of unknown provenance, found either in breeding colonies or as vagrants, provide evidence on species, sex, and age of the animal, which increases the value of associated samples. It further highlights the importance of external measurements of skeletal remains such as canine teeth in separating closely related species.

Indexed as

Fur SealsAnimalsAntarctic RegionsBody RemainsFemaleMaleOceans and SeasageAntarctic fur sealsexual dimorphismSub-Antarctic fur sealtooth

Identifiers

PMID36223543
PMCPMC9828835
OpenAlexW4304807994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.