ArticleJournal of public health management and practice : JPHMP
PH WINS 2021 Methodology Report.
Article in Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Public Health Enumeration in 2024: Who Is Keeping the Public Healthy?American journal of public health · 2025Article
- Public health informatics specialists in state and local public health workforce: insights from public health workforce interests and needs survey.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- New local health officials: health departments' newest leaders.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Individual and organizational factors associated with public health workforce competencies to advance health equity.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Bridging the gap: enhancing data science and leadership knowledge and skills in the context of the public health workforce.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Piloting a framework to explore the impacts of public health workforce capacity-building initiatives.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Understanding the mental health and intention to leave of the public health workforce in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Designing for dissemination among public health and clinical practitioners in the USA.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Standard Occupational Classification Codes: Gaps in Federal Data on the Public Health Workforce.American journal of public health · 2024Review
- Competencies, Training Needs, and Turnover Among Rural Compared With Urban Local Public Health Practitioners: 2021 Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey.American journal of public health · 2023Article
- Public health workforce survey data (2016-2021) related to employee turnover: proposed methods for harmonization and triangulation.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Competency Gaps Among Governmental Public Health Employees With and Without a Certification in Public Health.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
- Qualitative Insights From Governmental Public Health Employees About Experiences Serving During the COVID-19 Pandemic, PH WINS 2021.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
- Turnover, COVID-19, and Reasons for Leaving and Staying Within Governmental Public Health.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
- Recovery and Resiliency in 29 Big Cities: Results From the 2021 Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
- The Opportunity Cost of COVID for Public Health Practice: COVID-19 Pandemic Response Work and Lost Foundational Areas of Public Health Work.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
- Public Health Workforce Perceptions About Organizational Commitment to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Results From PH WINS 2021.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
- A Proven Partnership: Collecting National Public Health Workforce Data Using a Region-by-Region Approach.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
- The Price of Dedication: An Analysis of Wage Trajectories in State and Local Public Health From 2017 to 2024.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextThe Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey (PH WINS) was fielded in 2014 and 2017 and is the largest survey of the governmental public health workforce. It captures individual employees' perspectives on key issues such as workplace engagement and satisfaction, intention to leave, training needs, ability to address public health issues, as well as collects demographic information. This article describes the methods used for the 2021 PH WINS fielding. PH WINS: PH WINS 2021 was fielded to a nationally representative sample of staff in State Health Agency-Central Offices (SHA-COs) and local health departments (LHDs) from September 13, 2021, to January 14, 2022. The instrument was revised to assess the pandemic's potential toll on the workforce, including deployment to COVID-19 response roles and well-being, and the country's renewed focus on health equity and "Racism as a Public Health Crisis." PH WINS 2021 had 3 sampling frames: SHAs, Big Cities Health Coalition (BCHC) members, and LHDs. All participating agencies were surveyed using a census approach. PARTICIPATION: Overall, staff lists for 47 SHAs, 29 BCHC members, and 259 LHDs were collected, and the survey was sent to 137 446 individuals. PH WINS received a total of 44 732 responses, 35% of eligible respondents. The nationally representative SHA-CO frame includes a total of 14 957 individuals, and the nationally representative LHD frame includes 26 933 individuals from 439 LHDs (decentralized and nondecentralized). CONSIDERATIONS FOR ANALYSIS: PH WINS now offers a multiyear, nationally representative sample of both SHA-CO and LHD staff. Both practice and academia can use PH WINS to better understand the strengths, needs, and opportunities of the workforce. When using PH WINS for additional data analysis, there are a number of considerations both within the 2021 data set and when conducting multiyear and multiple cross-sectional analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.