Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36223426›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

An assessment of the quality of antenatal care and pregnancy outcomes in a tertiary hospital in Ghana.

Seth Amponsah-Tabi, Edward T Dassah, Gerald O Asubonteng, Frank Ankobea, John J K Annan, Ebenezer Senu, Stephen Opoku, Ebenezer Opoku, Henry S Opare-Addo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seth Amponsah-TabiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0001-8074-0145
Edward T DassahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana.
Gerald O AsubontengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana.
Frank AnkobeaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana.
John J K AnnanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana.
Ebenezer SenuDepartment of Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-2973-8952
Stephen OpokuDepartment of Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Ebenezer OpokuPublic Health Unit, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-0963-737X
Henry S Opare-AddoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana.
Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital · GHKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntenatal care (ANC) is imperative to decreasing adverse pregnancy outcomes and their related maternal mortality. However, in sub-Saharan Africa, increases in ANC coverage have not correlated well with improved maternal and fetal outcomes suggesting the quality of ANC received could be the missing link. This study assessed ANC quality and its effect on adverse pregnancy outcomes among women who delivered at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among women who delivered at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital within the study period. Women were selected through systematic sampling and interviewed using a pretested structured questionnaire as well as review of their medical records. Data were collected on their sociodemographic and reproductive characteristics, care provided during ANC and delivery outcomes. Categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test. Factors associated with quality of ANC and adverse pregnancy outcomes were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression to generate crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS and GraphPad Prism. P-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

results950 women were recruited into the study with mean age of 30.39±5.57 years. Less than one-tenth (7.6%) of the women received good quality ANC, 63.4% had average quality ANC, and 29.0% received poor quality ANC. Increasing educational level and initiating ANC in the first trimester [aOR 0.2; 95%CI 0.08-0.68; p<0.001] increased the odds of receiving good quality ANC while being unemployed decreased the odds of receiving good quality ANC [aOR 0.3; 95% CI 0.12-0.65; p = 0.003]. Receiving poor and average quality of ANC were significantly associated with increased likelihood of developing anaemia during pregnancy, preeclampsia with severe features or delivering a low birth weight baby.

conclusionMost women did not receive good quality ANC. High quality ANC should be provided while the women are encouraged to comply with the recommendations during ANC.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomePrenatal CareAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGhanaHumansPregnancyTertiary Care CentersYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID36223426
PMCPMC9555636
OpenAlexW4304758367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.