Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36223395›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Adaptive processing and perceptual learning in visual cortical areas V1 and V4.

Guadalupe Astorga, Minggui Chen, Yin Yan, Tiago Siebert Altavini, Caroline S Jiang, Wu Li, Charles Gilbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Expectation-dependent stimulus selectivity in the ventral visual cortical pathway.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Adaptive processing and perceptual learning in visual cortical areas V1 and V4.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guadalupe AstorgaThe Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065.
Minggui ChenThe Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065.ORCID 0000-0002-2617-9059
Yin YanState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5594-3020
Tiago Siebert AltaviniThe Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065.
Caroline S JiangThe Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065.
Wu LiState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2175-4579
Charles GilbertThe Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065.ORCID 0000-0002-3866-6110

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons in visual cortical areas primary visual cortex (V1) and V4 are adaptive processors, influenced by perceptual task. This is reflected in their ability to segment the visual scene into task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimulus components and by changing their tuning to task-relevant stimulus properties according to the current top-down instruction. Differences between the information represented in each area were seen. While V1 represented detailed stimulus characteristics, V4 filtered the input from V1 to carry the binary information required for the two-alternative judgement task. Neurons in V1 were activated at locations where the behaviorally relevant stimulus was placed well outside the grating-mapped receptive field. By systematically following the development of the task-dependent signals over the course of perceptual learning, we found that neuronal selectivity for task-relevant information was initially seen in V4 and, over a period of weeks, subsequently in V1. Once the learned information was represented in V1, on any given trial, task-relevant information appeared initially in V1 responses, followed by a 12-ms delay in V4. We propose that the shifting representation of learned information constitutes a mechanism for systems consolidation of memory.

Indexed as

Visual CortexLearningNeuronsPhotic StimulationVisual Perceptionperceptual learningperceptual tasktop-downV1V4

Identifiers

PMID36223395
PMCPMC9586333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.