Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36223386›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Yield of soybean genotypes identified through GGE biplot and path analysis.

Welder José Dos Santos Silva, Francisco de Alcântara Neto, Wahidah H Al-Qahtani, Mohammad K Okla, Abdulrahman Al-Hashimi, Paulo Fernando de Melo Jorge Vieira, Geraldo de Amaral Gravina, Alan Mario Zuffo, Alexson Filgueiras Dutra, Leonardo Castelo Branco Carvalho and 8 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Welder José Dos Santos SilvaPlant Science Department, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil.
Francisco de Alcântara NetoPlant Science Department, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil.
Wahidah H Al-QahtaniDepartment of Food Sciences & Nutrition, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad K OklaBotany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman Al-HashimiBotany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Paulo Fernando de Melo Jorge VieiraBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil.
Geraldo de Amaral GravinaState University of the North Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Alan Mario ZuffoState University of Maranhão, Balsas, Maranhão, Brazil.
Alexson Filgueiras DutraPlant Science Department, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2837-5720
Leonardo Castelo Branco CarvalhoFederal Rural University of the Amazônia, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Ricardo Silva de SousaDepartment of Agricultural and Soil Engineering, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil.
Arthur Prudêncio de Araujo PereiraFederal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Wallace de Sousa LeitePlant Science Department, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil.
Gabriel Barbosa da Silva JúniorPlant Science Department, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil.
Adriana Conceição da SilvaPlant Science Department, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil.
Marcos Renan Lima LeitePlant Science Department, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil.
Renato Lustosa SobrinhoDepartment of Agronomy, Federal University of Technology, Pato Branco, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2176-6745
Hamada AbdElgawadDepartment of Biology, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genotype × environment (G×E) interaction is an important source of variation in soybean yield, which can significantly influence selection in breeding programs. This study aimed to select superior soybean genotypes for performance and yield stability, from data from multi-environment trials (METs), through GGE biplot analysis that combines the main effects of the genotype (G) plus the genotype-by-environment (G×E) interaction. As well as, through path analysis, determine the direct and indirect influences of yield components on soybean grain yield, as a genotype selection strategy. Eight soybean genotypes from the breeding program of Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA) were evaluated in field trials using a randomized block experimental design, in an 8 x 8 factorial scheme with four replications in eight different environments of the Cerrado of Northeastern Brazil during two crop seasons. Phenotypic performance data were measured for the number of days to flowering (NDF), height of first pod insertion (HPI), final plant height (FPH), number of days to maturity (NDM), mass of 100 grains (M100) and grain yield (GY). The results revealed that the variance due to genotype, environment, and G×E interaction was highly significant (P < 0.001) for all traits. The ST820RR, BRS 333RR, BRS SambaíbaRR, M9144RR and M9056RR genotypes exhibited the greatest GY stability in the environments studied. However, only the BRS 333RR genotype, followed by the M9144RR, was able to combine good productive performance with high yield stability. The study also revealed that the HPI and the NDM are traits that should be prioritized in the selection of soybean genotypes due to the direct and indirect effects on the GY.

Indexed as

Glycine maxPlant BreedingEdible GrainGenotypePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID36223386
PMCPMC9555624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.