Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36223178›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2022

Mental Health Mobile Apps in the French App Store: Assessment Study of Functionality and Quality.

Florence Carrouel, Benjamin du Sartz de Vigneulles, Denis Bourgeois, Bernard Kabuth, Nicolas Baltenneck, Fanny Nusbaum, Valérie Burge, Sylvain Roy, Sophie Buchheit, Marie-Line Carrion-Martinaud and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Florence Carrouel *Health Systemic Process, Research Unit UR4129, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6823-1636
Benjamin du Sartz de Vigneulles *Health Systemic Process, Research Unit UR4129, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2115-8141
Denis BourgeoisHealth Systemic Process, Research Unit UR4129, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4754-2512
Bernard KabuthPrisme Team, Interpsy Laboratory, Research Unit EA4432, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6909-0444
Nicolas BaltenneckDevelopment, Individual, Process, Disability, University Lyon 2, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3987-9273
Fanny NusbaumHealth Systemic Process, Research Unit UR4129, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0595-3105
Valérie BurgePrisme Team, Interpsy Laboratory, Research Unit EA4432, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3852-5481
Sylvain RoyHealth Systemic Process, Research Unit UR4129, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6296-7485
Sophie BuchheitPrisme Team, Interpsy Laboratory, Research Unit EA4432, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3286-4976
Marie-Line Carrion-MartinaudThe Constellation, Health and Wellness Center, Rive-de-Gier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2695-7738
Catherine MassoubreDepartment of Psychiatry, Research Unit EA7423, Saint-Etienne University Hospital Center of Saint Etienne, University Jean Monnet, Saint Etienne, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6690-3630
Laurie Fraticelli *Health Systemic Process, Research Unit UR4129, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2647-658X
Claude Dussart *Health Systemic Process, Research Unit UR4129, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1091-9139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 800 million people, representing 11% of the world's population, are affected by mental health problems. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated problems and triggered a decline in well-being, with drastic increase in the incidence of conditions such as anxiety, depression, and stress. Approximately 20,000 mental health apps are listed in mobile app stores. However, no significant evaluation of mental health apps in French, spoken by approximately 300 million people, has been identified in the literature yet.

objectiveThis study aims to review the mental health mobile apps currently available on the French Apple App Store and Google Play Store and to evaluate their quality using Mobile App Rating Scale-French (MARS-F).

methodsScreening of mental health apps was conducted from June 10, 2022, to June 17, 2022, on the French Apple App Store and Google Play Store. A shortlist of 12 apps was identified using the criteria of selection and assessed using MARS-F by 9 mental health professionals. Intraclass correlation was used to evaluate interrater agreement. Mean (SD) scores and their distributions for each section and item were calculated.

resultsThe highest scores for MARS-F quality were obtained by Soutien psy avec Mon Sherpa (mean 3.85, SD 0.48), Evoluno (mean 3.54, SD 0.72), and Teale (mean 3.53, SD 0.87). Mean engagement scores (section A) ranged from 2.33 (SD 0.69) for Reflexe reussite to 3.80 (SD 0.61) for Soutien psy avec Mon Sherpa. Mean aesthetics scores (section C) ranged from 2.52 (SD 0.62) for Mental Booster to 3.89 (SD 0.69) for Soutien psy avec Mon Sherpa. Mean information scores (section D) ranged from 2.00 (SD 0.75) for Mental Booster to 3.46 (SD 0.77) for Soutien psy avec Mon Sherpa. Mean Mobile App Rating Scale subjective quality (section E) score varied from 1.22 (SD 0.26) for VOS - journal de l'humeur to 2.69 (SD 0.84) for Soutien psy avec Mon Sherpa. Mean app specificity (section F) score varied from 1.56 (SD 0.97) for Mental Booster to 3.31 (SD 1.22) for Evoluno. For all the mental health apps studied, except Soutien psy avec Mon Sherpa (11/12, 92%), the subjective quality score was always lower than the app specificity score, which was always lower than the MARS-F quality score, and that was lower than the rating score from the iPhone Operating System or Android app stores.

conclusionsMental health professionals assessed that, despite the lack of scientific evidence, the mental health mobile apps available on the French Apple App Store and Google Play Store were of good quality. However, they are reluctant to use them in their professional practice. Additional investigations are needed to assess their compliance with recommendations and their long-term impact on users.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mobile ApplicationsHumansMental HealthPandemicsbehavior changeFrenchlifestylementalmHealthmobile appsmobile healthpreventionwell-being

Identifiers

PMID36223178
PMCPMC9607929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.