ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2022
Improving analysis of the vaginal microbiota of women undergoing assisted reproduction using nanopore sequencing.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacodynamic interaction analysis of dydrogesterone, progesterone, and estradiol in combination-progestin HRT frozen embryo transfer: a prospective clinical cohort study.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Article
- Vaginal microbial community state types fail to predict IVF outcomes, whereasHuman reproduction open · 2026Article
- Profiling of vaginal microbial communities in Chilean women via self-sampling and nanopore sequencing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Metatranscriptomics-based metabolic modeling of patient-specific urinary microbiome during infection.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Article
- Toward accurate vaginal microbiome profiling: protocol, bioinformatics, and core microbiota characterisation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Methodological approaches in 16S sequencing of female reproductive tract in fertility patients: a review.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Review
- Live birth rates are unrelated to sex-steroid levels on ET day in a dydrogesterone-based 'programmed-ovulatory FET' protocol: a multi-centric prospective cohort study.Human reproduction open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSubclinical alterations of the vaginal microbiome have been described to be associated with female infertility and may serve as predictors for failure of in vitro fertilization treatment. While large prospective studies to delineate the role of microbial composition are warranted, integrating microbiome information into clinical management depends on economical and practical feasibility, specifically on a short duration from sampling to final results. The currently most used method for microbiota analysis is either metagenomics sequencing or amplicon-based microbiota analysis using second-generation methods such as sequencing-by-synthesis approaches (Illumina), which is both expensive and time-consuming. Thus, additional approaches are warranted to accelerate the usability of the microbiome as a marker in clinical praxis.
methodsHerein, we used a set of ten selected vaginal swabs from women undergoing assisted reproduction, comparing and performing critical optimization of nanopore-based microbiota analysis with the results from MiSeq-based data as a quality reference.
resultsThe analyzed samples carried varying community compositions, as shown by amplicon-based analysis of the V3V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene by MiSeq sequencing. Using a stepwise procedure to optimize adaptation, we show that a close approximation of the microbial composition can be achieved within a reduced time frame and at a minimum of costs using nanopore sequencing.
conclusionsOur work highlights the potential of a nanopore-based methodical setup to support the feasibility of interventional studies and contribute to the development of microbiome-based clinical decision-making in assisted reproduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.