ReviewCurrent urology reports2022
Best Practices for Reducing Bias in the Interview Process.
Review in Current urology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient Non-Attendance for MRI and MSCT Examinations in Croatia: An Observational Study Using Administrative and Patient-Reported Data.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Student Perceptions of the Implementation of Novel Sonography Phantoms in Radiography Curricula: A Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Article
- Child Abuse Pediatrics Fellowship Recruitment: Interview Structure and the Use of Multidisciplinary Interviewers.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
- Diversifying the Interventional Cardiology Workforce: Why It Matters and How to Achieve It.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Review
- A Network Analysis of Panic Disorder, Agoraphobia, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder in 463 Patients From a Psychiatric Hospital.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- The effectiveness of Ghana's antibiotic control policy framework: an analysis using the Anderson governance framework.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Article
- Article
- "The gay clubs are it": An analysis of straight women's motivations for frequenting gay bars.Sexualities · 2025Article
- Navigating identity in digital spaces: An exploratory study of social engagement and interactions.Social sciences & humanities open · 2025Article
- Multiple Mini Interviews vs Traditional Interviews: Assessing Reliability and Equity in Medical School Admissions [Letter].Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
- Are we ready? Emergency unit capacity at selected district level hospitals in Lusaka Province, Zambia: Barriers and facilitators for improving trauma care: a mixed methods approach.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Leveling the playing field: evaluating measurement equivalence in MMIs between genders.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- APOE4 and age affect the brain entorhinal cortex structure and blood arachidonic acid and docosahexaenoic acid levels after mild TBI.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The relationship between self-reported antipsychotics side effects and depression in Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024Article
- Cultivating Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Pulmonary and Critical Care Training: A Path Toward Health Care Excellence.Critical care clinics · 2024Review
- Building a healthy generation together: parents' experiences and perceived meanings of a family-based program delivered in ethnically diverse neighborhoods in Sweden.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewObjective measures of residency applicants do not correlate to success within residency. While industry and business utilize standardized interviews with blinding and structured questions, residency programs have yet to uniformly incorporate these techniques. This review focuses on an in-depth evaluation of these practices and how they impact interview formatting and resident selection. RECENT
findingsStructured interviews use standardized questions that are behaviorally or situationally anchored. This requires careful creation of a scoring rubric and interviewer training, ultimately leading to improved interrater agreements and biases as compared to traditional interviews. Blinded interviews eliminate even further biases, such as halo, horn, and affinity bias. This has also been seen in using multiple interviewers, such as in the multiple mini-interview format, which also contributes to increased diversity in programs. These structured formats can be adopted to the virtual interviews as well. There is growing literature that using structured interviews reduces bias, increases diversity, and recruits successful residents. Further research to measure the extent of incorporating this method into residency interviews will be needed in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.