ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2023
Critical analysis of risk factors for intrapartum fetal death.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immediate induction versus expectant management in primiparas presenting with decreased fetal movements at 39 weeks.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Temporal behavior of proportional mortality of fetal deaths according to underlying cause, 2011-2020.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026Article
- Women's psychological experiences of preterm labour and birth which results in an intrapartum stillbirth or a neonatal death: an empty systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Review
- Predictors of maternal and neonatal outcomes in labors complicated by shoulder dystocia: a comparative analysis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- Early Challenges: A Case Report of a Premature Baby with Down Syndrome and Uterine Rupture.AJP reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntrapartum fetal death is devastating for both parents and medical caregivers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for intrapartum fetal death, which often influence management in subsequent pregnancies.
methodsThis population-based cohort study included all singleton deliveries between the years 1991-2016 at Soroka University Medical Center. Trends over the years, risk factors for intrapartum fetal death and the effect of day of the week were examined. A generalized estimation equation (GEE) model was used to control for confounders.
resultsDuring the study period 344,536 deliveries were recorded, of which 251 (0.1%) suffered intrapartum fetal death. Rates did not change significantly over the years (p = 0.130, using the chi-square test for trends). Preterm delivery, placental abruption, uterine rupture, shoulder dystocia, congenital malformations, severe preeclampsia and fetal malpresentation were significantly more common in pregnancies complicated by intrapartum death. Using a GEE model; shoulder dystocia (aOR 23.8, 95% CI 9.9-57.3, p < 0.005), uterine rupture (aOR 19.0, 95% CI 7.0-51.4, p < 0.05), preterm delivery (aOR 11.9, 95% CI 8.6-16.5, p < 0.001), placental abruption (aOR 6.2, 95% CI 4.1-9.4, p < 0.001), fetal malpresentation (aOR 3.6, 95% CI 2.6-4.9, p < 0.005) and congenital malformations (aOR 2.6, 95% CI 1.9-3.5, p < 0.05) were all independent risk factors for intrapartum fetal death. Weekend deliveries were not at increased risk of intrapartum fetal death.
conclusionSeveral risk factors were identified for intrapartum fetal death, with shoulder dystocia demonstrating the highest risk. Unfortunately most factors are neither preventable nor predictable and interventions to decrease the rate of intrapartum fetal death remain elusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.