Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36222875›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in cardiac diagnostics-how to choose the right modality : A guide based on the new guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)].

Robin F Gohmann, Malte M Sieren, Matthias Gutberlet

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robin F GohmannAbteilung für Diagnostische und, Interventionelle Radiologie, Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Deutschland. robin.gohmann@gmx.de.
Malte M SierenKlinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland.
Matthias GutberletAbteilung für Diagnostische und, Interventionelle Radiologie, Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the guideline updates of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), noninvasive radiological cross-sectional imaging is taking an increasingly prominent role, while at the same time invasive diagnostic approaches are becoming less important. Especially for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic and acute coronary syndromes, there are fundamental changes in clinical routine. In addition, cross-sectional imaging also offers an alternative to diagnostic algorithms for other cardiac pathologies, especially echocardiography, which is increasingly used in the differential diagnosis of cardiac diseases. The radiologist should be aware of the recommendations of the current guidelines and encourage their establishment in clinical practice. This paper summarizes the indications of cross-sectional cardiac imaging with focus on new recommendations in the ESC guidelines and addresses specific strengths and weaknesses of each modality.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseHeartMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedCardiologyCoronary AngiographyHumansCardiac magnetic resonance imagingChest painComputed tomographyCoronary angiographyCoronary artery disease

Identifiers

PMID36222875
PMCPMC9613581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.