Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36222865›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

A novel analytical approach for outcome prediction in newly diagnosed NSCLC based on [

Lixia Zhang, Caiyun Xu, Xiaohui Zhang, Jing Wang, Han Jiang, Jinyan Chen, Hong Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lixia ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, 310006, Zhejiang, China.
Caiyun XuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, 310006, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaohui ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang, China. zhanghui4127@zju.edu.cn.
Jing WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang, China. wangjing5678@zju.edu.cn.
Han JiangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang, China.
Jinyan ChenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, 310006, Zhejiang, China.
Hong ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang, China. hzhang21@zju.edu.cn.
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a novel analytical approach based on

methodsA total of 190 newly diagnosed NSCLC patients who underwent pretreatment [

resultsThe combined models incorporating SULmax, MTV, NLR, and ECOG PS demonstrated significant prognostic superiority over PET-based models, clinical models, and TNM stage in terms of both PFS (C-index: 0.813 vs. 0.786 vs. 0.776 vs. 0.678, respectively) and OS (C-index: 0.856 vs. 0.792 vs. 0.781 vs. 0.674, respectively) in the training cohort. Similar results were observed in the test cohort for PFS (C-index: 0.808 vs. 0.764 vs. 0.748 vs. 0.679, respectively) and OS (C-index: 0.836 vs. 0.785 vs. 0.726 vs. 0.660, respectively) prediction. The combined model calibrated well in two cohorts. Decision curve analysis supported the clinical utility of the combined model.

conclusionsWe reported a novel analytical approach combining PET metabolic information with inflammatory biomarker and clinical characteristics, which could significantly improve outcome prediction in newly diagnosed NSCLC. KEY POINTS: • The nomogram incorporating SULmax, MTV, NLR, and ECOG PS outperformed the TNM stage for outcome prediction in patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC. • The established nomogram could provide refined prognostic stratification.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsBiomarkersFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTumor BurdenBiomarkersFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsMetabolic tumor volumeNon-small-cell lung cancerPositron emission tomography (PET)PrognosisTNM stage

Identifiers

PMID36222865
OpenAlexW4304631545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.