Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36222850›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2023

Long-term efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and a new approach for partial responders.

M Bosch-Ramírez, L Sánchez-Guillén, M J Alcaide-Quirós, M M Aguilar-Martínez, M Bellón-López, A López Delgado, F López-Rodríguez-Arias, A Muñoz-Duyos, X Barber-Valles, A Arroyo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of Tibial Nerve Electrostimulation in Patients With Fecal Incontinence: A Systematic Review.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M Bosch-RamírezDepartment of General Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Elche University Hospital, University Miguel Hernández of Elche, Camino de la Almazara 11, 03203, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
L Sánchez-GuillénDepartment of General Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Elche University Hospital, University Miguel Hernández of Elche, Camino de la Almazara 11, 03203, Elche, Alicante, Spain. drsanchezguillen@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0623-9074
M J Alcaide-QuirósDepartment of General Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Elche University Hospital, University Miguel Hernández of Elche, Camino de la Almazara 11, 03203, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
M M Aguilar-MartínezDepartment of General Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Elche University Hospital, University Miguel Hernández of Elche, Camino de la Almazara 11, 03203, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
M Bellón-LópezDepartment of General Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Elche University Hospital, University Miguel Hernández of Elche, Camino de la Almazara 11, 03203, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
A López DelgadoDepartment of General Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Elche University Hospital, University Miguel Hernández of Elche, Camino de la Almazara 11, 03203, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
F López-Rodríguez-AriasDepartment of General Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Elche University Hospital, University Miguel Hernández of Elche, Camino de la Almazara 11, 03203, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
A Muñoz-DuyosDepartment of General Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Mútua Terrassa University Hospital, University of Barcelona, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
X Barber-VallesDepartment of General Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Elche University Hospital, University Miguel Hernández of Elche, Camino de la Almazara 11, 03203, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
A ArroyoDepartment of General Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Elche University Hospital, University Miguel Hernández of Elche, Camino de la Almazara 11, 03203, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESUniversity Hospital Mútua de Terrassa · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for patients with faecal incontinence (FI) refractory to conservative treatment. Secondary aims were to identify predictors of response and validate new treatment pathways for partial responders.

methodsA prospective, interventional study was carried out in a specialist defecatory disorder unit from a university hospital between January 2010 and June 2017 on patients > 18 years old with FI refractory to conservative treatment. Thirty-minute PTNS sessions were performed in three phases (weekly, biweekly and monthly) up to a year, with clinical reassessment at 3, 6, 12 and 36 months. Patients were classified as optimal responders when their pretreatment Wexner score decreased > 50%; partial responders when it decreased 25-50%; and insufficient responders if it decreased < 25%. Only optimal and partial responders progressed into successive phases.

resultsBetween 2010 and 2017, 139 patients (110 women, median age 63 years [range 22-82 years]) were recruited. After the first phase, 4 patients were optimal responders, 93 were partial responders and 36 were insufficient responders. At 6 and 12 months, 66 and 89 patients respectively were optimal responders, with an optimal response rate of 64% at the end of treatment. A total of 93.3% patients with a partial response initially finally became optimal responders. Furthermore, at 36 months, 71.9% of patients were still optimal responders without supplementary treatment, although their quality of life did not improve significantly. Baseline Wexner scores ≤ 10 and symptom duration < 1 year were identified as predictive factors for positive responses to PTNS.

conclusionsPatients undergoing PTNS for 1 year following this protocol had optimal long-term responses. PTNS sessions for up to 1 year in patients who were partial responders prevents a high percentage of them from needing more invasive treatments, and maintains long-term continence in patients who were optimal responders.

Indexed as

Fecal IncontinenceAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overConservative TreatmentFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTibial NerveYoung AdultFaecal incontinenceLong term efficacyNeuromodulationPartial responsePercutaneous tibial nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36222850
PMCPMC10169891
OpenAlexW4304757919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.