Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36222280›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of hospice & palliative care2023

Design-Related Impacts on End-of-Life Experience: A Brief Report of Findings from an Exploratory Qualitative Study.

Michelle Knox

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michelle KnoxDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8771-6287
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the general preference to die at home, many deaths occur in institutionalized settings. While biomedical interventions to ameliorate end-of-life (EoL) suffering have advanced, the end-of-life care (EoLC) environment is less understood as a means of palliative support.

objectiveThis exploratory study considered the implications of clinical EoLC environments (facility buildings and their adjacent areas), aiming to understand how these designed spaces may be improved to better support experiences for patients, families, and staff.

methodsUsing an ethnography-driven approach, field observations (including participant commentaries) were captured at a standalone hospice and a palliative care ward at a general hospital. These were supplemented with semi-structured interviews. Content and thematic analyses were performed based on an interpretive-descriptive paradigm. Finally, informed by a review of field literature, analyses of all data were inter-related, and an interpretation was built to highlight key design considerations.

resultsThrough the analysis, 6 socio-spatial dimensions of EoLC facilities were identified

conclusionPhysical, emotional, and social wellbeing at the end of life is coalesced in and made visible by the designed environment. Therefore, evidence-based design serves as an important non-clinical intervention in such settings; however, patient involvement in such research remains difficult. Future scholarly research, new building schemes, and renovation projects should further examine the socio-spatial functions of clinical EoLC environments and investigate the challenges surrounding patient engagement within this domain.

Indexed as

Hospice CareHospicesTerminal CareDeathHumansPalliative CareQualitative Researchdeath and dyingend-of-life careevidence-based designfacility designhealthcare architecturepalliative carepalliative medicinepatient experience

Identifiers

PMID36222280
PMCPMC10248286
OpenAlexW4304689629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.