ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2022
[Research progress on the application of derived porous carbon materials in solid-phase microextraction].
Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Nanoscale Materials Applying for the Detection of Mycotoxins in Foods.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- [Preparation of porous boron nitride-doped polypyrrole-2,3,3-trimethylindole solid-phase microextraction coating for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon detection].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2023Article
- [Recent advances in the applications of metal-organic frameworks-based molecularly imprinted materials].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2023Article
- [Recent application advances of covalent organic frameworks for solid-phase extraction].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concentrations of target analytes in samples are low, and complex matrices can lead to a variety of interferences. Therefore, it is important to pretreat the samples before analysis. Compared to the time-consuming, tedious, and environmentally unfriendly solvent-based sample pretreatment methods, pretreatment techniques based on adsorption have more promising applications. Adsorption-based pretreatment technologies include solid-phase extraction, dispersive solid-phase extraction, magnetic solid-phase extraction, and solid-phase microextraction. Among them, solid-phase microextraction integrates sampling, extraction, enrichment, and injection into a single step. It has the advantages of being solvent-free, highly efficient, time efficient, and labor efficient. The extraction efficiency of solid-phase microextraction is closely related to the coating materials. There are various types of coating materials, including metal-organic frameworks, covalent organic frameworks, molecular imprinted polymers, porous carbon materials and so on. Porous carbon materials include traditional porous carbon materials such as activated carbon, carbon nanotubes, carbon molecular sieves, and derived porous carbon materials. Given their advantages of large specific surface area, controllable porous structure, large number of active sites, as well as good physical and chemical stability, porous carbon materials have been widely used in batteries, supercapacitors, catalysis, adsorption, and separation. Porous carbon materials are also popular coating materials for solid-phase microextraction. In particular, derived porous carbon materials find widespread use given their variety and designability. Most of these materials are derived from biomass and metal-organic framework precursors. In addition, past studies have mainly focused on the structural optimization of derived porous carbon materials. However, the applications of derived porous carbon materials in solid-phase microextraction are restricted by the following problems. (1) The preparation of porous carbon materials derived from covalent organic frameworks has seen great progress. However, there are only a few studies on their applications in solid-phase microextraction. (2) The prepared-derived porous carbon materials have excellent extraction abilities as when applied to solid-phase microextraction coatings. However, there is less systematic and clear mechanism to explain it. (3) Most derived porous carbon materials when used as solid-phase microextraction coatings show nice extraction performance only for specific analytes such as polar or non-polar substances. Therefore, in this paper, the research progress of derived porous carbon materials in solid-phase microextraction over the past three years has been summarized, and future research prospects have been prospected. Covalent organic frameworks can be used as precursors to prepare derived porous carbon materials with a narrow pore size distribution and a large specific surface area. It is necessary to further develop porous carbon materials derived from covalent organic frameworks as solid-phase microextraction coatings. The specific mechanism underlying this extraction effect should also be clarified. In addition, it is necessary to develop high-performance derived porous coating materials for broad-spectrum and high-sensitivity analysis of pollutants with different physical and chemical properties. Therefore, hierarchical porous carbon materials should be widely studied in solid-phase microextraction because of their multimodal pore sizes. A total of 56 references are cited in this paper, most of which are from the Elsevier database.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.