Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36222205›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2022

Intra-Articular Biomechanical Changes of the Meniscus and Ligaments During Stance Phase of Gait Circle after Different Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgical Procedures: A Finite Element Analysis.

Zi-Mu Mao, Zhen-Wei Wang, Chao Xu, Chen-He Liu, Zhi-Yu Zhang, Xiao-Li Ren, An-Qi Xue, Ze-Nan Li, Feng Zhao, Qi Yao and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Zi-Mu Mao *Department of Joint Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9045-0731
Zhen-Wei Wang *Department of Joint Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chao Xu *Xinjiang Key Laboratory Neurological Disorder Research, Key Laboratory of Autonomous Region, Urumchi, China.
Chen-He Liu *Department of Orthopaedics, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Zhi-Yu ZhangDepartment of Sports Medicine, Yan'an Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Yan'an, China.
Xiao-Li RenShanxi Institute of Sports Science, Taiyuan, Taiyuan, China.
An-Qi XueKey Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Ze-Nan LiFengtai Fourth Outpatient Department, Beijing Garrison, Beijing, China.
Feng ZhaoKey Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Qi YaoDepartment of Joint Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jia-Kuo YuInstitute of Sports Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Capital Medical University · CNBeihang University · CNBeijing Fengtai Hospital · CNPeking University · CNShanxi Medical University · CNTaiyuan Institute of Technology · CNThe Medical Device (United Kingdom) · GBXinjiang Medical University · CNYan'an University · CN

Funding

Beijing Hospital Authority XMLX202137Capital Health Research and Development of Special Fund 202022082Key Laboratory of Autonomous Region XinJiang Key Laboratory Neurological Disorder Research XJDX17112115National Key Research and Development Program 2016YFC1103202National Natural Scientific Foundation of China 11772038Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality L202052Peking University Health Science Center BMU2018 MX023Peking University Third Hospital BMU2019GJJXK012Peking University Third Hospital BYSY2018004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe debate on the superiority of single- or double-bundle for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has not ceased. The comparative studies on intra-articular biomechanics after different surgical reconstructions are rare. This study is to evaluate the biomechanical stress distribution intra-knee after single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by three-dimensional finite element analysis, and to observe the change of stress concentration under the condition of vertical gradient loads.

methodsIn this study, magnetic resonance imaging data were extracted from patients and healthy controls for biomechanical analysis. Patients included in the three models were matched in age and sex. The strength and distribution of induced stresses were analyzed in two frequently used procedures, anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using femoral-graft-tibial system under different loads, to mimic a post-operation mechanical motion. The three-dimensional finite-element models for normal ligament and two surgical methods were applied. A vertical force simulating daily walking was performed on the models to assess the interfacial stresses and displacements of intra-articular tissues and ligaments. The evaluation results mainly included the stress of each part of ligament and meniscus. The stress values of different parts of three models were extracted and compared.

resultsThe stress of ligament/graft at femoral side of three finite-element models was significantly higher than at tibial side, while the highest level was observed in single-bundle reconstruction finite-element model. With the increase of force, the maximum stress in the medial (7.1-7.1 MPa) and lateral (4.9-7.4 MPa) meniscus of single-bundle reconstruction finite-element model shifted from the anterior horn to the central area (p = 0.0161, 0.0479, respectively). The stress was shown to be at a lower level at femoral side and posterior cruciate ligament of intra-knee in two reconstruction finite-element models than that in normal finite-element models, while presented higher level at the tibial side than normal knee (p = 0.3528). The displacement of the femoral side and intra-knee areas in reconstruction finite-element models was greater than that in normal finite-element model (p = 0.0855).

conclusionCompared with the single-bundle technique, the graft of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has better stress dissipation effect and can prevent postoperative meniscus tear more effectively.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionFinite Element AnalysisGaitHumansLigamentsAnterior cruciate ligamentDisplacementDouble bundleFinite-element modelIntra-kneeSingle bundleStress

Identifiers

PMID36222205
PMCPMC9732611
OpenAlexW4304688509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.