Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36221935›Full record

ReviewJournal of stroke2022

Smartphone App in Stroke Management: A Narrative Updated Review.

Adriano Bonura, Francesco Motolese, Fioravante Capone, Gianmarco Iaccarino, Michele Alessiani, Mario Ferrante, Rosalinda Calandrelli, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro, Fabio Pilato

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of stroke, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06783049 (Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack With an Intelligent System), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06783049 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack With an Intelligent System

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Tiantan HospitalRan2025 to 2027Enrolled4,490ConditionsIschemic Stroke, Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)ArmsCerebrovascular Disease Secondary Prevention Smart Management System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Use of Social Media in Stroke: A Systematic Review.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adriano BonuraNeurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesco MotoleseNeurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Fioravante CaponeNeurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Gianmarco IaccarinoNeurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Michele AlessianiNeurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Mario FerranteNeurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Rosalinda CalandrelliNeuroradiology and Radiology Unit, Diagnostic Imaging, Radiotherapy, Oncology, Haematology Department, Agostino Gemelli University Policlinic (Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli) IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo Di LazzaroNeurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Fabio PilatoNeurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Università Campus Bio-Medico · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · IT

Funding

Associazione Nazionale fra le imprese Assicuratrici
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spread of smartphones and mobile-Health (m-health) has progressively changed clinical practice, implementing access to medical knowledge and communication between doctors and patients. Dedicated software called Applications (or Apps), assists the practitioners in the various phases of clinical practice, from diagnosis to follow-up and therapy management. The impact of this technology is even more important in diseases such as stroke, which are characterized by a complex management that includes several moments: primary prevention, acute phase management, rehabilitation, and secondary prevention. This review aims to evaluate and summarize the available literature on Apps for the clinical management of stroke. We described their potential and weaknesses, discussing potential room for improvement. Medline databases were interrogated for studies concerning guideline-based decision support Apps for stroke management and other medical scenarios from 2007 (introduction of the first iPhone) until January 2022. We found 551 studies. Forty-three papers were included because they fitted the scope of the review. Based on their purpose, Apps were classified into three groups: primary prevention Apps, acute stroke management Apps, and post-acute stroke Apps. We described the aim of each App and, when available, the results of clinical studies. For acute stroke, several Apps have been designed with the primary purpose of helping communication and sharing of patients' clinical data among healthcare providers. However, interactive systems Apps aiming to assist clinicians are still lacking, and this field should be developed because it may improve stroke patients' management.

Indexed as

Mobile applicationsPrimary and secondary preventionSmartphoneStrokeTechnologyTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36221935
PMCPMC9561218
OpenAlexW4298143329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.