ArticleGland surgery2022
Ultrasonographic and pathological features of sclerosing stromal tumor: a case report.
Article in Gland surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and ultrasound features of ovarian sclerosing stromal tumors: a large single-center case series.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We herein report a rare case of a sclerosing stromal tumor (SST) in an adolescent. In this case, the mass displayed a shrinking trend, combined with its ultrasonic manifestations and pathological characteristics and may provide some references for the selection and timing of treatment, to avoid excessive harm to patients. Case Description: A healthy 17-year-old adolescent female presented to the outpatient department, complaining of abnormal uterine bleeding, but no abdominal pain, bloating, chills, or fever. The patient had no history of malignant tumors, and no relevant family or genetic history. An ultrasound showed an inhomogeneous hypoechoic area (106 mm × 53 mm × 68 mm) in the right ovarian, a clear boundary, an anechoic area inside and blood flow was observed in the mass. At a follow-up regular re-examination, the mass displayed a shrinking trend from 95 mm × 50 mm × 88 mm, 61 mm × 28 mm × 42 mm, 43 mm × 28 mm × 40 mm, 43 mm × 28 mm × 40 mm, to 42 mm × 23 mm × 28 mm. The patient underwent laparoscopic surgery a week later. Based on the immunohistochemistry and morphology results, the posterior ovarian mass was diagnosed as an SST. At one month after operation, there was no obvious abnormality on ultrasound. Conclusions: The incidence of SST is relatively low. However, due to the low specificity of clinical manifestations, imaging examination and serum tumor markers, the diagnosis of SST mainly relies on pathological examination. Therefore, in clinical practice, the possibility of misdiagnosis is greater, and attention should be paid to the differentiation of ovarian malignant tumors. Surgical resection is recommended, and the effect is good. Surgical methods should be selected individually according to the size of the tumor and the age of the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.