ArticleGland surgery2022
Comprehensive analysis reveals potential hub genes and therapeutic drugs in an acquired lymphedema model.
Article in Gland surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- From stasis to systematics: deciphering the pathophysiology of secondary lymphedema through omics.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acquired lymphedema is a common and often severe complication of breast cancer surgery and radiology that seriously affects patients' quality of life. Nevertheless, the pathogenesis for acquired lymphedema is complex and remains unclear. The aim of this study is to find out possible genetic markers and potential drugs for acquired lymphedema. Methods: First, the GSE4333 datasets, which include expression data for six female humanized hairless immunocompetent SKH-1 mice (the condition of whom mimics acquired lymphedema), were reanalyzed. According to the criteria of a fold change (FC) ≥1.4 and an adjusted P value <0.05, we identified the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between a normal group and the lymphedema group. Next, we analyzed the Gene Ontology (GO) terms and enriched signaling pathways associated with these DEGs with an online tool DAVID. We also constructed protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks and selected meaningful gene modules for additional gene-drug interaction research. Finally, the extant drugs targeting these module genes were identified for further study of their therapeutic effects against acquired lymphedema. Results: A total of 481 DEGs were identified that were closely associated with the immune system, inflammatory response, and extracellular matrix (ECM) structural constituent terms, among others. Moreover, we identified the top 10 significant genes in the PPI networks and identified one extant drug, fiboflapon, that targets the Conclusions: We ultimately identified 10 hub genes, molecular mechanisms, and one extant drug related to acquired lymphedema. The findings identified targets and a potential drug for further research on acquired lymphedema.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.