ArticleGland surgery2022
Evaluation of indocyanine green combined with methylene blue staining in sentinel lymph node biopsy of breast cancer.
Article in Gland surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Use of indocyanine green fluorescence versus patent blue V dye for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer, a randomized controlled trial.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Trial
- Anatomical location of metastatic sentinel lymph node and clinicopathological characteristics for predicting risk of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Esophageal Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Predictive value of methylene blue combined with indocyanine green in sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: a prospective pilot cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- An Updated Review on the Emerging Role of Indocyanine Green (ICG) as a Sentinel Lymph Node Tracer in Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methylene blue as tracer used in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) have low detection rate and high false negative rate. Indocyanine green (ICG) can detect the flow of subcutaneous lymphatic vessels and the position of lymph nodes dynamically. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of ICG combined with methylene blue staining in SLNB of breast cancer. Methods: One hundred and fifty-six early breast cancer patients treated at our hospital from July 2020 to May 2022 were enrolled in this study. SLNB was performed by ICG combined with methylene blue staining under the guidance of the fluorescent tracer navigation system FLI-10B. Standard axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed in patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis confirmed by intraoperative frozen pathology, while low ALND was performed in patients with negative SLNs. According to the staining condition, the SLNs were divided into: (I) the combined group (SLNs with methylene blue staining and/or ICG luminescence); (II) the methylene blue group (SLNs with methylene blue staining alone); and (III) the ICG group (SLNs with ICG luminescence alone). The detection rate, accuracy, sensitivity, and false negative rate of SLNB were compared among the 3 groups. Results: A total of 592 SLNs were detected in the combined group (average 3.8 SLNs), yielding a detection rate of 97.4%; the accuracy, sensitivity, and false negative rates were 97.4%, 92.7%, and 7.3%. In the methylene blue group, 390 SLNs were detected (average 2.5 SLNs), yielding a detection rate of 84.6%; the accuracy, sensitivity, and false negative rates were 83.3%, 89.1%, and 10.9%. A total of 483 SLNs were detected in the ICG group (average 3.1 SLNs), the detection rate was 92.9%; the accuracy, sensitivity and false negative rates were 91.7%, 90.9%, and 9.1%. The average number of detected SLNs, detection rate and accuracy rate in the combined group were higher than those in the methylene blue group (P<0.05), and the accuracy rate of the combined group was higher than that of the ICG group (P<0.05). Conclusions: ICG combined with methylene blue staining is a promising and effective tracing strategy in the SLNB of breast cancer with high detection and accuracy rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.